Usage Score
14.9
Player Dossier
2015-2018Washington
Ben Burr-Kirven
LB • 6'0" • 221 lbs • Menlo Park, CA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Ben Burr-Kirven shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 56.3 disruption score.
Efficiency
56.3
Consistency
50.4
Season Value
32.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Washington
15161617171818
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Washington
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: California
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Ben Burr-Kirven, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Washington. Ben Burr-Kirven shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 56.3 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Washington paired 14.5 primary output with 56.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 56.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: California
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Postseason · Washington
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.1
Efficiency
56.3
Usage
14.9
Consistency
50.4
Best Game by takeover score
Ohio State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ohio State: 2.5. Auburn: 0. Unknown: 0. Utah: 0. Arizona State: 0.5. BYU: 0. UCLA: 1. Oregon: 1. Colorado: 2. California: 4. Stanford: 1.5. Washington State: 1. Utah: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio State: 11 by 70.8. Auburn: 13 by 50. Unknown: 9 by 37.5. Utah: 11 by 45.8. Arizona State: 20 by 55. BYU: 6 by 25. UCLA: 15 by 60. Oregon: 19 by 60. Colorado: 15 by 70. California: 14 by 90. Stanford: 12 by 65. Washington State: 10 by 51.7. Utah: 10 by 51.7
Split Comparison
Wins0.9 · n=8 · -1 vs Losses
Losses1.9 · n=4 · +1 vs Wins
First Half0.6 · n=7 · -1.2 vs Second Half
Second Half1.8 · n=6 · +1.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
California
Best efficiency game
90 vs California
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/1 | @ Ohio State10+ tackles | L 23-28 | 11 | 9 | — | 1.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/1 | vs Utah10+ tackles | W 10-3 | 10 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/24 | @ Washington State10+ tackles | W 28-15 | 10 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/4 | vs Stanford10+ tackles | W 27-23 | 12 | 6 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/27 | @ California10+ tackles · Splash game | L 10-12 | 14 | 9 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/20 | vs Colorado10+ tackles | W 27-13 | 15 | 8 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/13 | @ Oregon10+ tackles | L 27-30 | 19 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/6 | @ UCLA10+ tackles | W 31-24 | 15 | 9 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 9/30 | vs BYU | W 35-7 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/23 | vs Arizona State10+ tackles | W 27-20 | 20 | 14 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/16 | @ Utah10+ tackles | W 21-7 | 11 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Unknown | — | 9 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/1 | @ Auburn10+ tackles | L 16-21 | 13 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Washington
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
2015201620162017201720182018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Washington | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Postseason | Washington | 3 | 17.8 | 4.7 | 3 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Washington | 3 | 17.8 | 4.7 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Washington | 11 | 35.4 | 7.2 | 8 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Washington | 11 | 35.4 | 7.2 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Washington | 14.5 | 56.3 | 14.9 | 3.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Washington | 14.5 | 56.3 | 14.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
California
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 70.8 takeover score.
#2
Unknown
2
Primary metric
Game with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 58.5 takeover score.
#3
Ohio State
2.5
Primary metric
Loss with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 52.2 takeover score.
#4
Colorado
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 48.8 takeover score.
#5
Penn State
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 48 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Washington
14.5 primary output · 56.3 efficiency · 14.9 usage
32.8
#2
2018 Regular Season · Washington
32.8
14.5 primary · 56.3 efficiency · 14.9 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · Washington
28.4
11 primary · 35.4 efficiency · 7.2 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
1
Splash games
14
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2022 · Rating 0.7844
Coatesville Area · Coatesville, PA
- Committed To
- Central Michigan
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2022
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
293
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 38 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.