Usage / Role
11%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2008-2011Air Force
WR • 5'9" • Lake Elsinore, CA, USA
Jonathan Warzeka reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage / Role
11%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
9
Developing production for a receiver
Reliability
15
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
16
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2008 Regular Season · Air Force
Snapshot
Player Story
Jonathan Warzeka built his college career from 2008 through 2011 as a wide receiver from Lake Elsinore, CA wearing No. 15, spending time with Air Force. The clearest part of Jonathan Warzeka's career was his...
Read the storyJonathan Warzeka, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2008 Regular Season · Air Force. Jonathan Warzeka reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Air Force | 7 | - | 0 | 1 | 100 |
| 2009 Postseason | Air Force | 13 | 3 | 45 | 1 | 70 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Air Force | 13 | 15 | 201 | 4 | 70 |
| 2010 Postseason | Air Force | 13 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 80.1 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Air Force | 13 | 17 | 394 | 8 | 80.1 |
| 2011 Postseason | Air Force | 13 | 3 | 50 | 1 | 79.2 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Air Force | 13 | 28 | 392 | 4 | 79.2 |
Related Context
Jonathan Warzeka played WR for Air Force. Across 4 tracked seasons, Jonathan Warzeka recorded 48 passing yards, 865 rushing yards, and 1,094 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2010 with Air Force.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season
Air Force paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 95.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Army
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
31.2
Efficiency
95.3
Usage
28.1
Consistency
39.9
Best Game by takeover score
Army
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Georgia Tech: 12. Northwestern State: 38. BYU: 0. Oklahoma: 48. Wyoming: 21. Navy: 28. Colorado State: 0. San Diego State: 55. TCU: 22. Utah: 20. Army: 116. New Mexico: 0. UNLV: 46
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Georgia Tech: 1 by 80. Northwestern State: 1 by 100. Oklahoma: 3 by 100. Wyoming: 1 by 100. Navy: 1 by 100. San Diego State: 5 by 73.3. TCU: 1 by 100. Utah: 1 by 100. Army: 2 by 100. UNLV: 2 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Army
Best efficiency game
100 vs UNLV
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 12/27 | @ Georgia Tech | W 14-7 | — | 1 | 12 | 4.5 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Fri 11/19 | @ UNLV | W 35-20 | — | 2 | 46 | 27.5 | 23 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 11/13 | vs New Mexico | W 48-23 | — | — | — | 2.3 | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/6 | @ Army100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 42-22 | — | 2 | 116 | 27 | 58 | 2 | 63 |
| Sat 10/30 | vs Utah | L 23-28 | — | 1 | 20 | 12.5 | 20 | 0 | 20 |
| Sun 10/24 | @ TCU | L 7-38 | — | 1 | 22 | 10 | 22 | 0 | 22 |
| Sun 10/17 | @ San Diego State | L 25-27 | — | 5 | 55 | 6.5 | 11 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/9 | vs Colorado State | W 49-27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/2 | vs Navy | W 14-6 | — | 1 | 28 | 10 | 28 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 9/25 | @ Wyoming | W 20-14 | — | 1 | 21 | 14.5 | 21 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 9/18 | @ Oklahoma | L 24-27 | — | 3 | 48 | 10.2 | 16 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 9/11 | vs BYU | W 35-14 | — | — | — | 10.3 | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/4 | vs Northwestern State | W 65-21 | — | 1 | 38 | 16 | 38 | 1 | 38 |
Player Story
Jonathan Warzeka built his college career from 2008 through 2011 as a wide receiver from Lake Elsinore, CA wearing No. 15, spending time with Air Force. The clearest part of Jonathan Warzeka's career was his receiving role: 67 catches, 1,094 receiving yards, 8 touchdowns, and 865 rushing yards across 46 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2010 with Air Force. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
The value of the career arc is that it connects production to role, not just a name on a roster. His career also includes 48 passing yards, 865 rushing yards, and 1,469 return yards, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. With 46 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across Air Force.
The arc is straightforward: Jonathan Warzeka moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Air Force
2008-2011
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Air Force | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2009 Postseason | Air Force | 246 | 76.4 | 31.9 | 246 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Air Force | 246 | 76.4 | 31.9 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | Air Force | 406 | 95.3 | 28.1 | 160 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Air Force | 406 | 95.3 | 28.1 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Air Force | 442 | 75.6 | 29.6 | 36 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Air Force | 442 | 75.6 | 29.6 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
vs Houston
Week 1 · W 47-20 · Postseason
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
45
Receiving Yards
100 takeover
45 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
@ Army
Week 10 · W 42-22
116
Receiving Yards
100 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
116 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
vs San Diego State
Week 4 · W 26-14 · Conference game
44
Receiving Yards
99.3 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
44 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
@ Minnesota
Week 2 · L 13-20
44
Receiving Yards
98.5 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
44 receiving yards with a 97.8 efficiency score.
#5
vs San Diego State
Week 7 · L 27-41 · Conference game
96
Receiving Yards
97.1 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
96 receiving yards with a 91.4 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2008 Regular Season · Air Force
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2010 Postseason · Air Force
80.1
406 primary · 95.3 efficiency · 28.1 usage
#3
2010 Regular Season · Air Force
80.1
406 primary · 95.3 efficiency · 28.1 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.