Usage Score
29.6
Player Dossier
2008-2011Air Force
Jonathan Warzeka
WR • 5'9" • Lake Elsinore, CA, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Jonathan Warzeka reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
75.6
Consistency
42.5
Season Value
52.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season · Air Force
08090910101111
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Air Force
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Army
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jonathan Warzeka, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season · Air Force. Jonathan Warzeka reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season
Air Force paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 75.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: San Diego State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2011 Postseason · Air Force
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
34
Efficiency
75.6
Usage
29.6
Consistency
42.5
Best Game by takeover score
Toledo
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Toledo: 50. Unknown: 22. TCU: 18. Unknown: 34. Navy: 13. Notre Dame: 71. San Diego State: 96. Boise State: 12. New Mexico: 9. Army: 52. Wyoming: 5. UNLV: 0. Colorado State: 60
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Toledo: 3 by 100. Unknown: 1 by 100. TCU: 2 by 60. Unknown: 1 by 100. Navy: 2 by 43.3. Notre Dame: 6 by 78.9. San Diego State: 7 by 91.4. Boise State: 2 by 40. New Mexico: 1 by 60. Army: 2 by 100. Wyoming: 1 by 33.3. Colorado State: 3 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins26.8 · n=5 · -15.2 vs Losses
Losses42 · n=6 · +15.2 vs Wins
First Half43.4 · n=7 · +20.4 vs Second Half
Second Half23 · n=6 · -20.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
San Diego State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Toledo
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/28 | vs Toledo | L 41-42 | — | 3 | 50 | 16.1 | 16.70 | 1 | 37 |
| Sat 11/26 | @ Colorado State | W 45-21 | — | 3 | 60 | 18.2 | 20 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs UNLV | W 45-17 | — | — | — | 6 | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Wyoming | L 17-25 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Army | W 24-14 | — | 2 | 52 | 17.7 | 26 | 0 | 37 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ New Mexico | W 42-0 | — | 1 | 9 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Boise State | L 26-37 | — | 2 | 12 | 10 | 6 | 0 | 15 |
| Fri 10/14 | vs San Diego State2+ TD | L 27-41 | — | 7 | 96 | 11.5 | 13.70 | 2 | 26 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Notre Dame | L 33-59 | — | 6 | 71 | 8.1 | 11.80 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Navy | W 35-34 | — | 2 | 13 | 5.8 | 6.50 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 34 | 11.5 | 34 | 1 | 34 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs TCU | L 19-35 | — | 2 | 18 | 10.3 | 9 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 22 | 15.5 | 22 | 0 | 22 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Air Force
2008-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
2008200920092010201020112011
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Air Force | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2009 Postseason | Air Force | 246 | 76.4 | 31.9 | 246 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Air Force | 246 | 76.4 | 31.9 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | Air Force | 406 | 95.3 | 28.1 | 160 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Air Force | 406 | 95.3 | 28.1 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Air Force | 442 | 75.6 | 29.6 | 36 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Air Force | 442 | 75.6 | 29.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Army
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
116
Primary metric
116 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
San Diego State
44
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
44 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Houston
45
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
45 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Minnesota
44
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
44 receiving yards with a 97.8 efficiency score.
#5
San Diego State
96
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
96 receiving yards with a 91.4 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2008 Regular Season · Air Force
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2010 Postseason · Air Force
55
406 primary · 95.3 efficiency · 28.1 usage
#3
2010 Regular Season · Air Force
55
406 primary · 95.3 efficiency · 28.1 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,094
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 46 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.