Usage Score
37.1
Player Dossier
2009-2011Army
WR • 6'3" • Newburgh, NY, USA
Davyd Brooks reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
37.1
Efficiency
80.8
Consistency
74.5
Season Value
69.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Army
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Davyd Brooks, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Army. Davyd Brooks reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
Army paired 238 primary output with 86.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 80.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Navy
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
6
Receiving Yards / G
29.8
Efficiency
80.8
Usage
37.1
Consistency
74.5
Best Game by takeover score
Navy
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Northern Illinois: 37. Tulane: 40. Miami (OH): 18. Rutgers: 35. Temple: 7. Navy: 42
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Northern Illinois: 1 by 100. Tulane: 1 by 100. Miami (OH): 2 by 60. Rutgers: 3 by 77.8. Temple: 1 by 46.7. Navy: 2 by 100
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
6 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Navy
Best efficiency game
100 vs Navy
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Army
2009-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Army | 45 | 100 | 19.7 | — |
| 2010 Postseason | Army | 238 | 86.3 | 40 | 193 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Army | 238 | 86.3 | 40 | 0 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Army | 179 | 80.8 | 37.1 | -59 |
#1 Featured game
Hawai'i
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
49
Primary metric
49 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
SMU
30
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
30 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Navy
42
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
42 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Tulane
40
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
40 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Kent State
47
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
47 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2010 Postseason · Army
238 primary output · 86.3 efficiency · 40 usage
73.9
#2
2010 Regular Season · Army
73.9
238 primary · 86.3 efficiency · 40 usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · Army
69.1
179 primary · 80.8 efficiency · 37.1 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
462
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 17 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Davyd Brooks quick answers