Usage Score
10
Player Dossier
2009-2012Southern Miss
WR • 5'11" • Mobile, AL, USA
Quentin Pierce reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
10
Efficiency
80.5
Consistency
36.6
Season Value
46.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Southern Miss
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Quentin Pierce, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Southern Miss. Quentin Pierce reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
Southern Miss paired 454 primary output with 71.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 80.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2012 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTEP
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
7
Receiving Yards / G
35.9
Efficiency
80.5
Usage
10
Consistency
36.6
Best Game by takeover score
Memphis
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. East Carolina: 24. Boise State: 29. UCF: 5. Marshall: 39. SMU: 11. UTEP: 125. Memphis: 18
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. East Carolina: 1 by 100. Boise State: 2 by 96.7. UCF: 1 by 33.3. Marshall: 2 by 100. SMU: 1 by 73.3. UTEP: 2 by 100. Memphis: 2 by 60
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
7 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UTEP
Best efficiency game
100 vs UTEP
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Southern Miss
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Southern Miss | 247 | 55.8 | 14.9 | — |
| 2010 Postseason | Southern Miss | 454 | 71.5 | 14.7 | 207 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Southern Miss | 454 | 71.5 | 14.7 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Southern Miss | 166 | 53.7 | 9.9 | -288 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Southern Miss | 166 | 53.7 | 9.9 | 0 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Southern Miss | 251 | 80.5 | 10 | 85 |
#1 Featured game
UAB
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
108
Primary metric
108 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Tulsa
115
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
115 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
UTEP
125
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
125 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
UTEP
57
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
57 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Memphis
44
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
44 receiving yards with a 97.8 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2010 Postseason · Southern Miss
454 primary output · 71.5 efficiency · 14.7 usage
59.1
#2
2010 Regular Season · Southern Miss
59.1
454 primary · 71.5 efficiency · 14.7 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · Southern Miss
46.3
251 primary · 80.5 efficiency · 10 usage
3
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,118
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 37 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Quentin Pierce quick answers