Usage / Role
28%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2009-2012Massachusetts
WR • 6'3" • Christchurch, VA, USA
Deion Walker reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage / Role
28%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
64
Solid production for a receiver
Reliability
62
Reliable weekly contributor
Star Power
78
High-upside career profile
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2012 Regular Season · Massachusetts
Snapshot
Player Story
Deion Walker built his college career from 2009 through 2012 as a wide receiver from Christchurch, VA wearing No. 3, spending time with Massachusetts and Notre Dame. The clearest part of Deion Walker's career was his...
Read the storyDeion Walker, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2012 Regular Season · Massachusetts. Deion Walker reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 1 | 1 | 15 | 0 | 55.5 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2011 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2012 Regular Season | Massachusetts | 11 | 59 | 667 | 3 | 79 |
Related Context
Deion Walker played WR for Notre Dame and Massachusetts. Across 4 tracked seasons, Deion Walker recorded 682 receiving yards and 3 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2012 with Massachusetts.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season
Massachusetts paired 667 primary output with 71.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 71.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2012 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Notre Dame, Massachusetts.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ohio
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
60.6
Efficiency
71.9
Usage
26
Consistency
57.5
Best Game by takeover score
Ohio
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Indiana: 24. Michigan: 63. Miami (OH): 81. Ohio: 162. Western Michigan: 81. Bowling Green: 13. Vanderbilt: 51. Northern Illinois: 15. Akron: 47. Buffalo: 83. Central Michigan: 47
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Indiana: 1 by 100. Michigan: 4 by 100. Miami (OH): 6 by 90. Ohio: 11 by 98.2. Western Michigan: 9 by 60. Bowling Green: 3 by 28.9. Vanderbilt: 6 by 56.7. Northern Illinois: 2 by 50. Akron: 5 by 62.7. Buffalo: 5 by 100. Central Michigan: 7 by 44.8
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Ohio
Best efficiency game
100 vs Buffalo
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/23 | vs Central Michigan | L 21-42 | — | 7 | 47 | 6.7 | 6.70 | 1 | 11 |
| Sat 11/17 | vs Buffalo | L 19-29 | — | 5 | 83 | 16.6 | 16.60 | 0 | 38 |
| Sat 11/10 | @ Akron | W 22-14 | — | 5 | 47 | 9.4 | 9.40 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Northern Illinois | L 0-63 | — | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Vanderbilt | L 7-49 | — | 6 | 51 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 1 | 17 |
| Sat 10/20 | vs Bowling Green | L 0-24 | — | 3 | 13 | 4.3 | 4.30 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Western MichiganHigh volume | L 14-52 | — | 9 | 81 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Ohio100 receiving yards · High volume | L 34-37 | — | 11 | 162 | 14.7 | 14.70 | 1 | 33 |
| Sat 9/22 | @ Miami (OH) | L 16-27 | — | 6 | 81 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 9/15 | @ Michigan | L 13-63 | — | 4 | 63 | 15.8 | 15.80 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Indiana | L 6-45 | — | 1 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 0 | 24 |
Player Story
Deion Walker built his college career from 2009 through 2012 as a wide receiver from Christchurch, VA wearing No. 3, spending time with Massachusetts and Notre Dame. The clearest part of Deion Walker's career was his receiving role: 60 catches, 682 receiving yards, and 3 touchdowns across 12 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2012 with Massachusetts. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
The value of the career arc is that it connects production to role, not just a name on a roster. With 12 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across Massachusetts and Notre Dame.
The arc is straightforward: Deion Walker moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Notre Dame
2009-2011
Opening stop
Massachusetts
2012
Final stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 15 | 100 | 5.9 | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 0 | — | — | -15 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Massachusetts | 667 | 71.9 | 26 | 667 |
#1 Featured game
vs Ohio
Week 5 · L 34-37 · Conference game
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
162
Receiving Yards
99.4 takeover
162 receiving yards with a 98.2 efficiency score.
#2
@ Miami (OH)
Week 4 · L 16-27 · Conference game
81
Receiving Yards
80 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
81 receiving yards with a 90 efficiency score.
#3
vs Buffalo
Week 12 · L 19-29 · Conference game
83
Receiving Yards
78.2 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
83 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
@ Michigan
Week 3 · L 13-63
63
Receiving Yards
76 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
63 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
vs Nevada
Week 1 · W 35-0
15
Receiving Yards
73.2 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
15 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2012 Regular Season · Massachusetts
667 primary output · 71.9 efficiency · 26 usage
79
#2
2009 Regular Season · Notre Dame
55.5
15 primary · 100 efficiency · 5.9 usage
#3
2010 Regular Season · Notre Dame
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
1
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.