Usage Score
14.8
Player Dossier
2010-2012UCLA
Joseph Fauria
WR • 6'7" • Encino, CA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Joseph Fauria reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
85.9
Consistency
71.3
Season Value
68
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · UCLA
1011111212
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- UCLA
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Houston
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Joseph Fauria, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · UCLA. Joseph Fauria reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason
UCLA paired 637 primary output with 85.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 85.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arizona
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2012 Postseason · UCLA
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
45.5
Efficiency
85.9
Usage
14.8
Consistency
71.3
Best Game by takeover score
Baylor
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Baylor: 59. Rice: 53. Nebraska: 42. Houston: 27. Oregon State: 20. Colorado: 20. California: 38. Utah: 41. Arizona State: 25. Arizona: 81. Washington State: 70. USC: 61. Stanford: 66. Stanford: 34
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Baylor: 5 by 78.7. Rice: 3 by 100. Nebraska: 4 by 70. Houston: 2 by 90. Oregon State: 2 by 66.7. Colorado: 2 by 66.7. California: 3 by 84.4. Utah: 3 by 91.1. Arizona State: 3 by 55.6. Arizona: 5 by 100. Washington State: 4 by 100. USC: 4 by 100. Stanford: 4 by 100. Stanford: 2 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins46.7 · n=9 · +3.3 vs Losses
Losses43.4 · n=5 · -3.3 vs Wins
First Half37 · n=7 · -17 vs Second Half
Second Half54 · n=7 · +17 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Arizona
Best efficiency game
100 vs Stanford
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/28 | vs Baylor | L 26-49 | — | 5 | 59 | 11.8 | 11.80 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 12/1 | @ Stanford | L 24-27 | — | 2 | 34 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 11/24 | vs Stanford | L 17-35 | — | 4 | 66 | 16.5 | 16.50 | 1 | 24 |
| Sat 11/17 | vs USC | W 38-28 | — | 4 | 61 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 1 | 17 |
| Sun 11/11 | @ Washington State | W 44-36 | — | 4 | 70 | 17.5 | 17.50 | 1 | 31 |
| Sun 11/4 | vs Arizona2+ TD | W 66-10 | — | 5 | 81 | 16.2 | 16.20 | 2 | 28 |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Arizona State | W 45-43 | — | 3 | 25 | 8.3 | 8.30 | 1 | 13 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Utah | W 21-14 | — | 3 | 41 | 13.7 | 13.70 | 0 | 23 |
| Sun 10/7 | @ California | L 17-43 | — | 3 | 38 | 12.7 | 12.70 | 1 | 18 |
| Sat 9/29 | @ Colorado | W 42-14 | — | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 12 |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Oregon State | L 20-27 | — | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 13 |
| Sun 9/16 | vs Houston | W 37-6 | — | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Nebraska2+ TD | W 36-30 | — | 4 | 42 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 2 | 27 |
| Thu 8/30 | @ Rice | W 49-24 | — | 3 | 53 | 17.7 | 17.70 | 1 | 36 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UCLA
2010-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
20102011201120122012
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | UCLA | 21 | 46.7 | 4.8 | — |
| 2011 Postseason | UCLA | 481 | 79.4 | 22.1 | 460 |
| 2011 Regular Season | UCLA | 481 | 79.4 | 22.1 | 0 |
| 2012 Postseason | UCLA | 637 | 85.9 | 14.8 | 156 |
| 2012 Regular Season | UCLA | 637 | 85.9 | 14.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Houston
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
110
Primary metric
110 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Arizona
81
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
81 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Washington State
70
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
70 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Stanford
66
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
66 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
USC
61
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
61 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2012 Postseason · UCLA
637 primary output · 85.9 efficiency · 14.8 usage
68
#2
2012 Regular Season · UCLA
68
637 primary · 85.9 efficiency · 14.8 usage
#3
2011 Postseason · UCLA
61.3
481 primary · 79.4 efficiency · 22.1 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
4
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,139
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 29 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.