Usage Score
24
Player Dossier
2009-2012Miami (OH)
Andy Cruse
WR • 6'4" • Cincinnati, OH, USA
Alpha targetPossession profile
Andy Cruse reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
59.7
Consistency
67
Season Value
62.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Miami (OH)
09101112
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Miami (OH)
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Central Michigan
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Andy Cruse, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Miami (OH). Andy Cruse reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season
Miami (OH) paired 681 primary output with 59.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 59.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2012 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kent State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2012 Regular Season · Miami (OH)
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
56.8
Efficiency
59.7
Usage
24
Consistency
67
Best Game by takeover score
Ball State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ohio State: 48. Unknown: 60. Boise State: 42. Massachusetts: 13. Akron: 111. Cincinnati: 60. Bowling Green: 54. Ohio: 24. Buffalo: 87. Kent State: 123. Central Michigan: 54. Ball State: 5
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio State: 8 by 40. Unknown: 12 by 33.3. Boise State: 6 by 46.7. Massachusetts: 3 by 28.9. Akron: 9 by 82.2. Cincinnati: 4 by 100. Bowling Green: 7 by 51.4. Ohio: 5 by 32. Buffalo: 6 by 96.7. Kent State: 8 by 100. Central Michigan: 5 by 72. Ball State: 1 by 33.3
Split Comparison
Wins49.3 · n=3 · -9.8 vs Losses
Losses59.1 · n=8 · +9.8 vs Wins
First Half55.7 · n=6 · -2.2 vs Second Half
Second Half57.8 · n=6 · +2.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Kent State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Kent State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/23 | vs Ball State | L 24-31 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 11/17 | @ Central Michigan | L 16-30 | — | 5 | 54 | 9.5 | 10.80 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 11/10 | vs Kent State100 receiving yards · High volume | L 32-48 | — | 8 | 123 | 15.4 | 15.40 | 2 | 47 |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Buffalo | L 24-27 | — | 6 | 87 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 10/27 | vs Ohio | W 23-20 | — | 5 | 24 | 4.8 | 4.80 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/13 | @ Bowling Green | L 12-37 | — | 7 | 54 | 7.7 | 7.70 | 1 | 13 |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Cincinnati | L 14-52 | — | 4 | 60 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 9/29 | @ Akron100 receiving yards · High volume | W 56-49 | — | 9 | 111 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 1 | 27 |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Massachusetts | W 27-16 | — | 3 | 13 | 4.3 | 4.30 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/15 | @ Boise State | L 12-39 | — | 6 | 42 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 14 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs UnknownHigh volume | — | — | 12 | 60 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 12 |
| Sat 9/1 | @ Ohio StateHigh volume | L 10-56 | — | 8 | 48 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 11 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Miami (OH)
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
2009201020112012
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Miami (OH) | 248 | 86.3 | 11 | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Miami (OH) | 342 | 70.4 | 12.9 | 94 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Miami (OH) | 391 | 62.4 | 15 | 49 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Miami (OH) | 681 | 59.7 | 24 | 290 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Central Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
179
Primary metric
179 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Kent State
123
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
123 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Toledo
61
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
61 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Northwestern
56
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
56 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Buffalo
49
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
49 receiving yards with a 81.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2012 Regular Season · Miami (OH)
681 primary output · 59.7 efficiency · 24 usage
62.3
#2
2011 Regular Season · Miami (OH)
54.8
391 primary · 62.4 efficiency · 15 usage
#3
2009 Regular Season · Miami (OH)
47.6
248 primary · 86.3 efficiency · 11 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
5
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2008 · Rating 0.7967
Turpin · Cincinnati, OH
- Committed To
- Miami (OH)
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2008
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
1,662
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 39 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.