Usage Score
21.5
Player Dossier
2008-2012Troy
Chip Reeves
WR • 5'10" • Stone Mountain, GA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Chip Reeves reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
80.5
Consistency
73.3
Season Value
68.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Troy
080910101112
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Troy
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UAB
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Chip Reeves, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Troy. Chip Reeves reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season
Troy paired 1,050 primary output with 80.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 80.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2012 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UAB
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 83.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2012 Regular Season · Troy
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
87.5
Efficiency
80.5
Usage
21.5
Consistency
73.3
Best Game by takeover score
Middle Tennessee
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UAB: 125. Louisiana: 37. Mississippi State: 79. North Texas: 120. South Alabama: 67. Western Kentucky: 110. Florida International: 34. Florida Atlantic: 88. Tennessee: 144. Navy: 88. Arkansas State: 142. Middle Tennessee: 16
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UAB: 6 by 100. Louisiana: 4 by 61.7. Mississippi State: 9 by 58.5. North Texas: 7 by 100. South Alabama: 3 by 100. Western Kentucky: 3 by 100. Florida International: 5 by 45.3. Florida Atlantic: 5 by 100. Tennessee: 5 by 100. Navy: 8 by 73.3. Arkansas State: 6 by 100. Middle Tennessee: 4 by 26.7
Split Comparison
Wins86.8 · n=5 · -1.2 vs Losses
Losses88 · n=7 · +1.2 vs Wins
First Half89.7 · n=6 · +4.3 vs Second Half
Second Half85.3 · n=6 · -4.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UAB
Best efficiency game
100 vs Arkansas State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/24 | @ Middle Tennessee | L 21-24 | — | 4 | 16 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 11/17 | vs Arkansas State100 receiving yards | L 34-41 | — | 6 | 142 | 23.7 | 23.70 | 1 | 51 |
| Sat 11/10 | vs NavyHigh volume | W 41-31 | — | 8 | 88 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 38 |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Tennessee100 receiving yards | L 48-55 | — | 5 | 144 | 25.2 | 28.80 | 1 | 51 |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Florida Atlantic | L 27-34 | — | 5 | 88 | 17.6 | 17.60 | 0 | 51 |
| Sat 10/20 | vs Florida International | W 38-37 | — | 5 | 34 | 6.8 | 6.80 | 1 | 10 |
| Thu 10/11 | vs Western Kentucky100 receiving yards | L 26-31 | — | 3 | 110 | 36.7 | 36.70 | 1 | 45 |
| Sat 9/29 | @ South Alabama | W 31-10 | — | 3 | 67 | 22.3 | 22.30 | 0 | 39 |
| Sat 9/22 | @ North Texas100 receiving yards | W 14-7 | — | 7 | 120 | 17.1 | 17.10 | 1 | 76 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Mississippi StateHigh volume | L 24-30 | — | 9 | 79 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Louisiana | L 24-37 | — | 4 | 37 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/1 | @ UAB100 receiving yards | W 39-29 | — | 6 | 125 | 20.8 | 20.80 | 1 | 55 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Troy
2008-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
200820092010201020112012
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Troy | 40 | 66.7 | 5.5 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Troy | 363 | 81.7 | 9.3 | 323 |
| 2010 Postseason | Troy | 515 | 76 | 9.8 | 152 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Troy | 515 | 76 | 9.8 | 0 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Troy | 0 | — | — | -515 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Troy | 1,050 | 80.5 | 21.5 | 1,050 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UAB
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
125
Primary metric
125 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
UAB
95
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
95 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Arkansas State
142
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
142 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Western Kentucky
96
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
96 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Tennessee
144
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
144 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2012 Regular Season · Troy
1,050 primary output · 80.5 efficiency · 21.5 usage
68.5
#2
2010 Postseason · Troy
44.6
515 primary · 76 efficiency · 9.8 usage
#3
2010 Regular Season · Troy
44.6
515 primary · 76 efficiency · 9.8 usage
Milestones
5
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,968
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 39 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.