Usage Score
22.6
Player Dossier
2008-2009Akron
Deryn Bowser
WR • 6'1" • Los Angeles, CA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Deryn Bowser reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
75.6
Consistency
68.9
Season Value
51.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season · Akron
0809
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 2
- Program Path
- Akron
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Ohio
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Deryn Bowser, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season · Akron. Deryn Bowser reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season
Akron paired 785 primary output with 80.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 75.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2009 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Regular Season · Akron
Games
6
Receiving Yards / G
51.2
Efficiency
75.6
Usage
22.6
Consistency
68.9
Best Game by takeover score
Buffalo
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Penn State: 63. Unknown: 86. Indiana: 86. Central Michigan: 6. Ohio: 47. Buffalo: 19
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Penn State: 3 by 100. Unknown: 8 by 71.7. Indiana: 3 by 100. Central Michigan: 1 by 40. Ohio: 4 by 78.3. Buffalo: 2 by 63.3
Split Comparison
Losses44.2 · n=5
First Half78.3 · n=3 · +54.3 vs Second Half
Second Half24 · n=3 · -54.3 vs First Half
All Games51.2 · n=6
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
6 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
100 vs Indiana
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Akron
2008-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
20082009
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Akron | 785 | 80.3 | 27.2 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Akron | 307 | 75.6 | 22.6 | -478 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Ohio
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
118
Primary metric
118 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Ball State
117
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
117 receiving yards with a 97.5 efficiency score.
#3
Unknown
86
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
86 receiving yards with a 71.7 efficiency score.
#4
Indiana
86
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
86 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Penn State
63
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
63 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2008 Regular Season · Akron
785 primary output · 80.3 efficiency · 27.2 usage
70.1
#2
2009 Regular Season · Akron
51.5
307 primary · 75.6 efficiency · 22.6 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
3
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
1,092
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 18 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.