Usage / Role
75%
Major offensive role
Player Dossier
2008-2012California
QB • 6'2" • Greensboro, NC, USA
Zach Maynard is a balanced quarterback profile with 27.4 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage / Role
75%
Major offensive role
Impact Production
45
Developing production for a quarterback
Reliability
56
Useful contributor with volatile peaks
Star Power
53
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2011 Postseason · California
Snapshot
Player Story
Zach Maynard built his college career from 2008 through 2012 as a quarterback from Greensboro, NC wearing No. 6, spending time with Buffalo and California. The clearest part of Zach Maynard's career was his passing...
Read the storyZach Maynard, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2011 Postseason · California. Zach Maynard is a balanced quarterback profile with 27.4 usage in the latest tracked season.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Total Offense | Pass Yds | Rush Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Buffalo | 7 | 63 | 7 | 56 | 0 | 16.8 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Buffalo | 12 | 2,994 | 2,694 | 300 | 19 | 70.1 |
| 2011 Postseason | California | 13 | 149 | 188 | -39 | 0 | 70.8 |
| 2011 Regular Season | California | 13 | 2,949 | 2,802 | 147 | 21 | 70.8 |
| 2012 Regular Season | California | 10 | 2,246 | 2,214 | 32 | 15 | 67.7 |
Related Context
Zach Maynard played QB for Buffalo and California. Across 4 tracked seasons, Zach Maynard recorded 7,905 passing yards, 496 rushing yards, and 35 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2009 with Buffalo.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason
California paired 3,098 primary output with 58.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 61.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Buffalo, California.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Pittsburgh
Loss with 392 yards of offense and 63.1 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
249.5
Efficiency
61.2
Usage
21
Consistency
75.9
Best Game by takeover score
Pittsburgh
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UTEP: 178. Pittsburgh: 392. UCF: 194. Temple: 296. Central Michigan: 247. Gardner-Webb: 239. Akron: 241. Western Michigan: 361. Bowling Green: 187. Ohio: 269. Miami (OH): 197. Kent State: 193
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UTEP: 24 by 67.7. Pittsburgh: 44 by 63.1. UCF: 41 by 53. Temple: 50 by 49.5. Central Michigan: 39 by 60.4. Gardner-Webb: 23 by 75. Akron: 41 by 60.8. Western Michigan: 56 by 61.8. Bowling Green: 37 by 58. Ohio: 43 by 58.5. Miami (OH): 24 by 83.8. Kent State: 44 by 43.2
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Pittsburgh
Best efficiency game
83.8 vs Miami (OH)
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/27 | @ Kent State | W 9-6 | 13 | 32 | 181 | 40.6 | 0 | 2 | 43.2 | 12 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 11 |
| Wed 11/18 | @ Miami (OH)Dual-threat | W 42-17 | 13 | 18 | 136 | 72.2 | 1 | 0 | 83.8 | 6 | 61 | 10.20 | 1 | 16 |
| Wed 11/11 | vs Ohio | L 24-27 | 17 | 36 | 230 | 47.2 | 2 | 2 | 58.5 | 7 | 39 | 5.60 | 0 | 13 |
| Wed 11/4 | vs Bowling Green | L 29-30 | 13 | 27 | 149 | 48.1 | 1 | 0 | 58 | 10 | 38 | 3.80 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Western Michigan300-yard game | L 31-34 | 26 | 50 | 327 | 52.0 | 1 | 2 | 61.8 | 6 | 34 | 5.70 | 0 | 42 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs Akron | W 21-17 | 20 | 35 | 205 | 57.1 | 2 | 2 | 60.8 | 6 | 36 | 6 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Gardner-Webb3+ TD | W 40-3 | 16 | 20 | 232 | 80.0 | 3 | 0 | 75 | 3 | 7 | 2.30 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 10/3 | vs Central Michigan | L 13-20 | 16 | 31 | 210 | 51.6 | 1 | 1 | 60.4 | 8 | 37 | 4.60 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 9/26 | @ Temple | L 13-37 | 26 | 41 | 281 | 63.4 | 1 | 4 | 49.5 | 9 | 15 | 1.70 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/19 | @ UCF | L 17-23 | 22 | 35 | 184 | 62.9 | 1 | 1 | 53 | 6 | 10 | 1.70 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs Pittsburgh300-yard game · 3+ TD | L 27-54 | 24 | 35 | 400 | 68.6 | 4 | 1 | 63.1 | 9 | -8 | -0.90 | 0 | 12 |
| Sun 9/6 | @ UTEP | W 23-17 | 12 | 19 | 159 | 63.2 | 1 | 0 | 67.7 | 5 | 19 | 3.80 | 0 | 10 |
Player Story
Zach Maynard built his college career from 2008 through 2012 as a quarterback from Greensboro, NC wearing No. 6, spending time with Buffalo and California. The clearest part of Zach Maynard's career was his passing role: 7,905 passing yards, 47 touchdown passes, 1,083 attempts, and 496 rushing yards across 42 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2011 with California. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
Quarterback careers are usually judged first by volume, efficiency, and scoring chances. His career also includes 496 rushing yards and 35 receiving yards, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. With 42 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across Buffalo and California.
The arc is straightforward: Zach Maynard moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Buffalo
2008-2009
Opening stop
California
2011-2012
Final stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Buffalo | 63 | 36.5 | 3.6 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Buffalo | 2,994 | 61.2 | 21 | 2,931 |
| 2011 Postseason | California | 3,098 | 58.5 | 18.9 | 104 |
| 2011 Regular Season | California | 3,098 | 58.5 | 18.9 | 0 |
| 2012 Regular Season | California | 2,246 | 56.5 | 27.4 | -852 |
#1 Featured game
@ Utah
Week 9 · L 27-49 · Conference game
Loss with 312 yards of offense and 61.7 efficiency.
312
Total Offense
83 takeover
312 total offense with 61.7 efficiency.
#2
vs Pittsburgh
Week 2 · L 27-54
392
Total Offense
76.6 takeover
Loss with 392 yards of offense and 63.1 efficiency.
392 total offense with 63.1 efficiency.
#3
vs Utah
Week 8 · W 34-10 · Conference game
291
Total Offense
69.6 takeover
Win with 291 yards of offense and 68.7 efficiency.
291 total offense with 68.7 efficiency.
#4
vs USC
Week 7 · L 9-30 · Conference game
289
Total Offense
69.2 takeover
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
289 total offense with 46.8 efficiency.
#5
@ Western Michigan
Week 8 · L 31-34 · Conference game
361
Total Offense
67.7 takeover
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
361 total offense with 61.8 efficiency.
#1 Season by Season Value
2011 Postseason · California
3,098 primary output · 58.5 efficiency · 18.9 usage
70.8
#2
2011 Regular Season · California
70.8
3,098 primary · 58.5 efficiency · 18.9 usage
#3
2009 Regular Season · Buffalo
70.1
2,994 primary · 61.2 efficiency · 21 usage
11
250+ passing yards
5
300+ total offense
5
3+ TD games
17
Above avg efficiency
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.