Usage Score
16.8
Player Dossier
2008-2009UAB
Mark Ferrell
WR • 6'2" • South Boston, VA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Mark Ferrell reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
84.8
Consistency
61.9
Season Value
58.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · UAB
0809
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 2
- Program Path
- UAB
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UCF
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Mark Ferrell, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · UAB. Mark Ferrell reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season
UAB paired 320 primary output with 84.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 84.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2009 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Marshall
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Regular Season · UAB
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
29.1
Efficiency
84.8
Usage
16.8
Consistency
61.9
Best Game by takeover score
UCF
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Rice: 0. SMU: 45. Troy: 29. Texas A&M: 0. Ole Miss: 15. Marshall: 60. UTEP: 52. Florida Atlantic: 49. Memphis: 13. East Carolina: 35. UCF: 22
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. SMU: 4 by 75. Troy: 4 by 48.3. Ole Miss: 1 by 100. Marshall: 5 by 80. UTEP: 2 by 100. Florida Atlantic: 2 by 100. Memphis: 1 by 86.7. East Carolina: 2 by 100. UCF: 2 by 73.3
Split Comparison
Wins28.5 · n=4 · -0.9 vs Losses
Losses29.4 · n=7 · +0.9 vs Wins
First Half24.8 · n=6 · -9.4 vs Second Half
Second Half34.2 · n=5 · +9.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Marshall
Best efficiency game
100 vs East Carolina
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/28 | vs UCF | L 27-34 | — | 2 | 22 | 10.5 | 11 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/21 | @ East Carolina | L 21-37 | — | 2 | 35 | 14.3 | 17.50 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 11/14 | @ Memphis | W 31-21 | — | 1 | 13 | 8.3 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/7 | vs Florida Atlantic | W 56-29 | — | 2 | 49 | 12.8 | 24.50 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 10/31 | @ UTEP | W 38-33 | — | 2 | 52 | 19 | 26 | 0 | 38 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Marshall | L 7-27 | — | 5 | 60 | 12 | 12 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ Ole Miss | L 13-48 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/26 | @ Texas A&M | L 19-56 | — | — | — | 3 | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/19 | @ Troy | L 14-27 | — | 4 | 29 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs SMU | L 33-35 | — | 4 | 45 | 21.7 | 11.30 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Rice | W 44-24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UAB
2008-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
20082009
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | UAB | 177 | 73.9 | 13.3 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | UAB | 320 | 84.8 | 16.8 | 143 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UCF
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
82
Primary metric
82 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Marshall
60
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
60 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#3
UTEP
52
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
52 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Florida Atlantic
49
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
49 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
SMU
45
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
45 receiving yards with a 75 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2009 Regular Season · UAB
320 primary output · 84.8 efficiency · 16.8 usage
58.3
#2
2008 Regular Season · UAB
40.9
177 primary · 73.9 efficiency · 13.3 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
497
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 19 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.