Usage Score
20.5
Player Dossier
2008-2011Tulsa
Damaris Johnson
WR • 5'8" • Norco, LA, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Damaris Johnson reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
77.4
Consistency
59.3
Season Value
55.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · Tulsa
080809101011
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Tulsa
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Southern Miss
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Damaris Johnson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · Tulsa. Damaris Johnson reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season
Tulsa paired 1,131 primary output with 86.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 77.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2011 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Rice
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Postseason · Tulsa
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
67.1
Efficiency
77.4
Usage
20.5
Consistency
59.3
Best Game by takeover score
Hawai'i
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Hawai'i: 101. East Carolina: 51. Bowling Green: 84. Oklahoma State: 54. Unknown: 2. Memphis: 59. SMU: 63. Tulane: 10. Notre Dame: 46. Rice: 163. Houston: 56. UTEP: 146. Southern Miss: 37
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Hawai'i: 4 by 100. East Carolina: 4 by 85. Bowling Green: 7 by 80. Oklahoma State: 4 by 90. Unknown: 1 by 13.3. Memphis: 3 by 100. SMU: 5 by 84. Tulane: 3 by 22.2. Notre Dame: 4 by 76.7. Rice: 8 by 100. Houston: 4 by 93.3. UTEP: 6 by 100. Southern Miss: 4 by 61.7
Split Comparison
Wins78 · n=9 · +22 vs Losses
Losses56 · n=3 · -22 vs Wins
First Half59.1 · n=7 · -17.2 vs Second Half
Second Half76.3 · n=6 · +17.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Rice
Best efficiency game
100 vs Hawai'i
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/25 | vs Hawai'i100 receiving yards | W 62-35 | — | 4 | 101 | 22.1 | 25.30 | 1 | 59 |
| Fri 11/26 | vs Southern Miss | W 56-50 | — | 4 | 37 | 9.6 | 9.30 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/20 | vs UTEP100 receiving yards | W 31-28 | — | 6 | 146 | 16.8 | 24.30 | 0 | 43 |
| Sun 11/14 | @ Houston | W 28-25 | — | 4 | 56 | 9.9 | 14 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 11/6 | vs Rice100 receiving yards · High volume | W 64-27 | — | 8 | 163 | 18.5 | 20.40 | 2 | 41 |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Notre Dame | W 28-27 | — | 4 | 46 | 8.2 | 11.50 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 10/16 | vs Tulane | W 52-24 | — | 3 | 10 | 13.9 | 3.30 | 0 | 6 |
| Sun 10/10 | @ SMU | L 18-21 | — | 5 | 63 | 8 | 12.60 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/2 | @ Memphis | W 48-7 | — | 3 | 59 | 12.9 | 19.70 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 9/25 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 2 | 11.4 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Sat 9/18 | @ Oklahoma State | L 28-65 | — | 4 | 54 | 16 | 13.50 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Bowling Green | W 33-20 | — | 7 | 84 | 11 | 12 | 0 | 18 |
| Sun 9/5 | @ East Carolina | L 49-51 | — | 4 | 51 | 9.7 | 12.80 | 0 | 17 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Tulsa
2008-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
200820082009201020102011
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Postseason | Tulsa | 608 | 79.1 | 19.7 | — |
| 2008 Regular Season | Tulsa | 608 | 79.1 | 19.7 | 0 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Tulsa | 1,131 | 86.3 | 31.5 | 523 |
| 2010 Postseason | Tulsa | 872 | 77.4 | 20.5 | -259 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Tulsa | 872 | 77.4 | 20.5 | 0 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Tulsa | 0 | — | — | -872 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Southern Miss
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
196
Primary metric
196 receiving yards with a 76.9 efficiency score.
#2
Rice
163
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
163 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Houston
144
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
144 receiving yards with a 96 efficiency score.
#4
UTEP
146
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
146 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
New Mexico
109
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
109 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2009 Regular Season · Tulsa
1,131 primary output · 86.3 efficiency · 31.5 usage
68.9
#2
2010 Postseason · Tulsa
55.9
872 primary · 77.4 efficiency · 20.5 usage
#3
2010 Regular Season · Tulsa
55.9
872 primary · 77.4 efficiency · 20.5 usage
Milestones
10
100+ receiving yards
6
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
2,611
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 39 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.