Usage / Role
4%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2008-2011Tulane
FB • 6'1" • Lafayette, LA, USA
Kasey Stelly leans balanced backfield option traits and 19.5 efficiency.
Usage / Role
4%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
8
Developing production for a back
Reliability
6
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
17
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2010 Regular Season · Tulane
Snapshot
Kasey Stelly, FB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2010 Regular Season · Tulane. Kasey Stelly leans balanced backfield option traits and 19.5 efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Tulane | 4 | 27 | 3 | 24 | 0 | 47.7 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Tulane | 3 | 9 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 20 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Tulane | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Tulane | 3 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 26.4 |
Related Context
Kasey Stelly played FB for Tulane. Across 4 tracked seasons, Kasey Stelly recorded 3 rushing yards and 40 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2008 with Tulane.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season
Tulane paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2008 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 34.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2011 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTEP
Loss with 19 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
4
Scrimmage Yards / G
6.8
Efficiency
34.4
Usage
3.5
Consistency
46.3
Best Game by takeover score
UTEP
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. SMU: -4. UTEP: 19. Rice: 5. Houston: 7
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. SMU: 1 by 0. UTEP: 2 by 79.2. Rice: 2 by 29.2. Houston: 2 by 29.2
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
4 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
UTEP
Best efficiency game
79.2 vs UTEP
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Tulane
2008-2011
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Tulane | 27 | 34.4 | 3.5 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Tulane | 9 | 30.6 | 1.8 | -18 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Tulane | 0 | — | 0 | -9 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Tulane | 7 | 19.5 | 1.9 | 7 |
#1 Featured game
@ SMU
Week 13 · L 21-26 · Conference game
Loss with 11 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
11
Scrimmage Yards
65.8 takeover
11 scrimmage yards and 2 usage.
#2
@ UTEP
Week 7 · L 21-24 · Conference game
19
Scrimmage Yards
63.5 takeover
Loss with 19 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
19 scrimmage yards and 4 usage.
#3
vs Houston
Week 11 · L 17-73 · Conference game
5
Scrimmage Yards
48.9 takeover
Loss with 5 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
5 scrimmage yards and 1.8 usage.
#4
@ Houston
Week 11 · L 14-42 · Conference game
7
Scrimmage Yards
26.1 takeover
Loss with 7 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
7 scrimmage yards and 4.3 usage.
#5
vs Rice
Week 9 · L 17-42 · Conference game
5
Scrimmage Yards
22.2 takeover
Loss with 5 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
5 scrimmage yards and 3.9 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2010 Regular Season · Tulane
0 primary output · — efficiency · 0 usage
50
#2
2008 Regular Season · Tulane
47.7
27 primary · 34.4 efficiency · 3.5 usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · Tulane
26.4
7 primary · 19.5 efficiency · 1.9 usage
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.