Usage Score
17.8
Player Dossier
2009-2010Marshall
Chuck Walker
WR • 5'10" • Oakland, CA, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Chuck Walker reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
50.8
Consistency
52.6
Season Value
47.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Marshall
090910
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- Marshall
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Chuck Walker, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Marshall. Chuck Walker reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
Marshall paired 350 primary output with 47.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 50.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Bowling Green
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Regular Season · Marshall
Games
8
Receiving Yards / G
27.4
Efficiency
50.8
Usage
17.8
Consistency
52.6
Best Game by takeover score
Tulane
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ohio State: 18. West Virginia: 2. Bowling Green: 66. Ohio: 7. Southern Miss: 11. UAB: 49. SMU: 38. Tulane: 28
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio State: 2 by 60. West Virginia: 1 by 13.3. Bowling Green: 7 by 62.9. Ohio: 2 by 23.3. Southern Miss: 4 by 18.3. UAB: 4 by 81.7. SMU: 3 by 84.4. Tulane: 3 by 62.2
Split Comparison
Wins28 · n=3 · +1 vs Losses
Losses27 · n=5 · -1 vs Wins
First Half23.3 · n=4 · -8.3 vs Second Half
Second Half31.5 · n=4 · +8.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Bowling Green
Best efficiency game
84.4 vs SMU
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/27 | vs Tulane | W 38-23 | — | 3 | 28 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 1 | 18 |
| Sat 11/20 | @ SMU | L 17-31 | — | 3 | 38 | 12.7 | 12.70 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 11/6 | @ UAB | W 31-17 | — | 4 | 49 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 0 | 28 |
| Sun 10/3 | @ Southern Miss | L 16-41 | — | 4 | 11 | 2.8 | 2.80 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/25 | vs Ohio | W 24-23 | — | 2 | 7 | 3.5 | 3.50 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 9/18 | @ Bowling Green | L 28-44 | — | 7 | 66 | 9.4 | 9.40 | 0 | 16 |
| Fri 9/10 | vs West Virginia | L 21-24 | — | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Thu 9/2 | @ Ohio State | L 7-45 | — | 2 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 13 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Marshall
2009-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
200920092010
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Postseason | Marshall | 350 | 47.3 | 17 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Marshall | 350 | 47.3 | 17 | 0 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Marshall | 219 | 50.8 | 17.8 | -131 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
119
Primary metric
119 receiving yards with a 79.3 efficiency score.
#2
UAB
108
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
108 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Bowling Green
66
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
66 receiving yards with a 62.9 efficiency score.
#4
UAB
49
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
49 receiving yards with a 81.7 efficiency score.
#5
SMU
38
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
38 receiving yards with a 84.4 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2009 Postseason · Marshall
350 primary output · 47.3 efficiency · 17 usage
49.5
#2
2009 Regular Season · Marshall
49.5
350 primary · 47.3 efficiency · 17 usage
#3
2010 Regular Season · Marshall
47.5
219 primary · 50.8 efficiency · 17.8 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
569
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 18 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.