Usage Score
12.5
Player Dossier
2008-2010Houston
Kierrie Johnson
WR • 5'10" • USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Kierrie Johnson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
75.5
Consistency
61.3
Season Value
62
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Houston
08090910
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Houston
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kierrie Johnson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Houston. Kierrie Johnson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season
Houston paired 572 primary output with 75.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 75.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2010 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Regular Season · Houston
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
47.7
Efficiency
75.5
Usage
12.5
Consistency
61.3
Best Game by takeover score
Texas Tech
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 61. UTEP: 43. UCLA: 3. Tulane: 18. Mississippi State: 52. Rice: 10. SMU: 26. Memphis: 26. UCF: 57. Tulsa: 140. Southern Miss: 71. Texas Tech: 65
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 3 by 100. UTEP: 2 by 100. UCLA: 2 by 10. Tulane: 3 by 40. Mississippi State: 5 by 69.3. Rice: 1 by 66.7. SMU: 3 by 57.8. Memphis: 2 by 86.7. UCF: 5 by 76. Tulsa: 5 by 100. Southern Miss: 3 by 100. Texas Tech: 3 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins28.3 · n=4 · -28.6 vs Losses
Losses56.9 · n=7 · +28.6 vs Wins
First Half31.2 · n=6 · -33 vs Second Half
Second Half64.2 · n=6 · +33 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tulsa
Best efficiency game
100 vs Texas Tech
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/28 | @ Texas Tech | L 20-35 | — | 3 | 65 | 21.7 | 21.70 | 0 | 52 |
| Sun 11/21 | @ Southern Miss | L 41-59 | — | 3 | 71 | 23.7 | 23.70 | 1 | 54 |
| Sun 11/14 | vs Tulsa100 receiving yards | L 25-28 | — | 5 | 140 | 28 | 28 | 1 | 66 |
| Sat 11/6 | vs UCF | L 33-40 | — | 5 | 57 | 11.4 | 11.40 | 1 | 21 |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Memphis | W 56-17 | — | 2 | 26 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 10/23 | @ SMU | W 45-20 | — | 3 | 26 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/16 | @ Rice | L 31-34 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sun 10/10 | vs Mississippi State | L 24-47 | — | 5 | 52 | 10.4 | 10.40 | 1 | 18 |
| Sat 9/25 | vs Tulane | W 42-23 | — | 3 | 18 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 15 |
| Sun 9/19 | @ UCLA | L 13-31 | — | 2 | 3 | 1.5 | 1.50 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/11 | vs UTEP | W 54-24 | — | 2 | 43 | 21.5 | 21.50 | 0 | 36 |
| Sun 9/5 | vs Unknown2+ TD | — | — | 3 | 61 | 20.3 | 20.30 | 2 | 35 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Houston
2008-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
2008200920092010
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Houston | 499 | 78.2 | 9.9 | — |
| 2009 Postseason | Houston | 237 | 86.5 | 5.6 | -262 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Houston | 237 | 86.5 | 5.6 | 0 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Houston | 572 | 75.5 | 12.5 | 335 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Tulsa
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
140
Primary metric
140 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Rice
142
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
142 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Rice
66
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
66 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
East Carolina
104
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
104 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Air Force
36
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
36 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2010 Regular Season · Houston
572 primary output · 75.5 efficiency · 12.5 usage
62
#2
2008 Regular Season · Houston
52.5
499 primary · 78.2 efficiency · 9.9 usage
#3
2009 Postseason · Houston
50.3
237 primary · 86.5 efficiency · 5.6 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
1,308
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 31 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.