Usage / Role
1%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2009-2011UConn
TE • 6'5" • Tyrone, GA, USA
Corey Manning reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage / Role
1%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
8
Developing production for a tight end
Reliability
12
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
15
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2009 Regular Season · UConn
Snapshot
Corey Manning, TE. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2009 Regular Season · UConn. Corey Manning reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | UConn | 1 | - | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| 2010 Regular Season | UConn | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 43.4 |
| 2011 Regular Season | UConn | 2 | 2 | 13 | 0 | 57.4 |
Related Context
Corey Manning played TE for UConn. Across 3 tracked seasons, Corey Manning recorded 17 receiving yards and 1 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2011 with UConn.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season
UConn paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 43.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2011 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Cincinnati
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
2
Receiving Yards / G
6.5
Efficiency
43.4
Usage
4.8
Consistency
70.5
Best Game by takeover score
Cincinnati
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Western Michigan: 4. Cincinnati: 9
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
2 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Cincinnati
Best efficiency game
60 vs Cincinnati
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UConn
2009-2011
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | UConn | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | UConn | 4 | 26.7 | 4.8 | 4 |
| 2011 Regular Season | UConn | 13 | 43.4 | 4.8 | 9 |
#1 Featured game
@ Cincinnati
Week 14 · L 27-35 · Conference game
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
9
Receiving Yards
58.9 takeover
9 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
#2
vs Vanderbilt
Week 5 · W 40-21
4
Receiving Yards
47.6 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
4 receiving yards with a 26.7 efficiency score.
#3
vs Western Michigan
Week 5 · L 31-38
4
Receiving Yards
28.7 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
4 receiving yards with a 26.7 efficiency score.
#4
vs South Florida
Week 14 · W 29-27 · Conference game
0
Receiving Yards
— takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2009 Regular Season · UConn
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2011 Regular Season · UConn
57.4
13 primary · 43.4 efficiency · 4.8 usage
#3
2010 Regular Season · UConn
43.4
4 primary · 26.7 efficiency · 4.8 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.