Usage Score
24.6
Player Dossier
2009-2012Pittsburgh
Mike Shanahan
WR • 6'5" • North Huntingdon, PA, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Mike Shanahan reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
87.7
Consistency
70.1
Season Value
70.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Pittsburgh
0909101011111212
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Pittsburgh
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Buffalo
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Mike Shanahan, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Pittsburgh. Mike Shanahan reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason
Pittsburgh paired 983 primary output with 87.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 87.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2012 Postseason · Pittsburgh
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
75.6
Efficiency
87.7
Usage
24.6
Consistency
70.1
Best Game by takeover score
Ole Miss
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ole Miss: 57. Unknown: 54. Cincinnati: 59. Virginia Tech: 111. Unknown: 144. Syracuse: 83. Louisville: 74. Buffalo: 39. Temple: 67. Notre Dame: 38. UConn: 79. Rutgers: 62. South Florida: 116
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ole Miss: 4 by 95. Unknown: 6 by 60. Cincinnati: 5 by 78.7. Virginia Tech: 5 by 100. Unknown: 5 by 100. Syracuse: 4 by 100. Louisville: 4 by 100. Buffalo: 2 by 100. Temple: 6 by 74.4. Notre Dame: 4 by 63.3. UConn: 3 by 100. Rutgers: 5 by 82.7. South Florida: 9 by 85.9
Split Comparison
Wins79 · n=5 · +14 vs Losses
Losses65 · n=6 · -14 vs Wins
First Half83.1 · n=7 · +16.3 vs Second Half
Second Half66.8 · n=6 · -16.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
100 vs UConn
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/5 | @ Ole Miss | L 17-38 | — | 4 | 57 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 1 | 20 |
| Sun 12/2 | @ South Florida100 receiving yards · High volume | W 27-3 | — | 9 | 116 | 12.9 | 12.90 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 11/24 | vs Rutgers | W 27-6 | — | 5 | 62 | 12.4 | 12.40 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 11/10 | @ UConn | L 17-24 | — | 3 | 79 | 26.3 | 26.30 | 1 | 39 |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Notre Dame | L 26-29 | — | 4 | 38 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/27 | vs Temple | W 47-17 | — | 6 | 67 | 11.2 | 11.20 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Buffalo | W 20-6 | — | 2 | 39 | 19.5 | 19.50 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Louisville | L 35-45 | — | 4 | 74 | 18.5 | 18.50 | 0 | 35 |
| Fri 10/5 | @ Syracuse | L 13-14 | — | 4 | 83 | 20.8 | 20.80 | 0 | 46 |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | — | — | 5 | 144 | 28.8 | 28.80 | 2 | 77 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Virginia Tech100 receiving yards | W 35-17 | — | 5 | 111 | 22.2 | 22.20 | 1 | 40 |
| Fri 9/7 | @ Cincinnati | L 10-34 | — | 5 | 59 | 11.8 | 11.80 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Unknown | — | — | 6 | 54 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 15 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Pittsburgh
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
20092009201020102011201120122012
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 211 | 83.9 | 14.4 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 211 | 83.9 | 14.4 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 589 | 82.1 | 19.3 | 378 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 589 | 82.1 | 19.3 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 493 | 71.8 | 15.9 | -96 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 493 | 71.8 | 15.9 | 0 |
| 2012 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 983 | 87.7 | 24.6 | 490 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 983 | 87.7 | 24.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Buffalo
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
85
Primary metric
85 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
North Carolina
83
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
83 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Florida International
82
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
82 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
144
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
144 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
South Florida
116
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
116 receiving yards with a 85.9 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2012 Postseason · Pittsburgh
983 primary output · 87.7 efficiency · 24.6 usage
70.6
#2
2012 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
70.6
983 primary · 87.7 efficiency · 24.6 usage
#3
2010 Postseason · Pittsburgh
59
589 primary · 82.1 efficiency · 19.3 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
2,276
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 44 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.