Usage Score
18.3
Player Dossier
2009-2012Rutgers
WR • 6'4" • Wall Township, NJ, USA
Timothy Wright reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
18.3
Efficiency
69.2
Consistency
37.5
Season Value
56.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Rutgers
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Timothy Wright, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Rutgers. Timothy Wright reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason
Rutgers paired 449 primary output with 69.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 69.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: South Florida
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
37.4
Efficiency
69.2
Usage
18.3
Consistency
37.5
Best Game by takeover score
Virginia Tech
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Virginia Tech: 11. Tulane: 29. Unknown: 17. South Florida: 125. Arkansas: 57. UConn: 11. Temple: 68. Kent State: 30. Army: 8. Cincinnati: 11. Pittsburgh: 66. Louisville: 16
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Virginia Tech: 1 by 73.3. Tulane: 3 by 64.4. Unknown: 2 by 56.7. South Florida: 8 by 100. Arkansas: 5 by 76. UConn: 3 by 24.4. Temple: 4 by 100. Kent State: 2 by 100. Army: 1 by 53.3. Cincinnati: 1 by 73.3. Pittsburgh: 6 by 73.3. Louisville: 3 by 35.6
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
South Florida
Best efficiency game
100 vs Kent State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/28 | @ Virginia Tech | L 10-13 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Fri 11/30 | vs Louisville | L 17-20 | — | 3 | 16 | 5.3 | 5.30 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 11/24 | @ Pittsburgh | L 6-27 | — | 6 | 66 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 11/17 | @ Cincinnati | W 10-3 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 11/10 | vs Army | W 28-7 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/27 | vs Kent State | L 23-35 | — | 2 | 30 | 15 | 15 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Temple | W 35-10 | — | 4 | 68 | 17 | 17 | 1 | 32 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs UConn | W 19-3 | — | 3 | 11 | 3.7 | 3.70 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 9/22 | @ Arkansas | W 35-26 | — | 5 | 57 | 11.4 | 11.40 | 0 | 24 |
| Thu 9/13 | @ South Florida100 receiving yards · High volume | W 23-13 | — | 8 | 125 | 15.6 | 15.60 | 0 | 46 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sun 9/2 | @ Tulane | W 24-12 | — | 3 | 29 | 9.7 | 9.70 | 0 | 15 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Rutgers
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Rutgers | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Rutgers | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Rutgers | 147 | 82.2 | 9.1 | 147 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Rutgers | 147 | 82.2 | 9.1 | 0 |
| 2012 Postseason | Rutgers | 449 | 69.2 | 18.3 | 302 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Rutgers | 449 | 69.2 | 18.3 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
South Florida
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
125
Primary metric
125 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
West Virginia
39
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
39 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Temple
68
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
68 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Iowa State
25
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
25 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Pittsburgh
66
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
66 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2012 Postseason · Rutgers
449 primary output · 69.2 efficiency · 18.3 usage
56.3
#2
2012 Regular Season · Rutgers
56.3
449 primary · 69.2 efficiency · 18.3 usage
#3
2011 Postseason · Rutgers
49.7
147 primary · 82.2 efficiency · 9.1 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
596
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 19 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Timothy Wright quick answers