Usage / Role
5%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2009-2012Massachusetts
RB • 5'11" • New Wilmington, PA, USA
Chris Burns leans balanced backfield option traits and 13.4 efficiency.
Usage / Role
5%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
8
Developing production for a back
Reliability
0
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
22
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2010 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
Snapshot
Chris Burns, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2010 Regular Season · Pittsburgh. Chris Burns leans balanced backfield option traits and 13.4 efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 3 | 29 | 29 | 0 | 0 | 41.6 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 7 | 49 | 49 | 0 | 1 | 46.7 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Massachusetts | 3 | 33 | 20 | 13 | 0 | 36.7 |
Related Context
Chris Burns played RB for Pittsburgh and Massachusetts. Across 3 tracked seasons, Chris Burns recorded 98 rushing yards, 13 receiving yards, and 1 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2010 with Pittsburgh.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season
Pittsburgh paired 49 primary output with 24.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 13.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2012 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Pittsburgh, Massachusetts.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UConn
Loss with 30 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
3
Scrimmage Yards / G
11
Efficiency
13.4
Usage
14.9
Consistency
23.2
Best Game by takeover score
UConn
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UConn: 30. Vanderbilt: -1. Central Michigan: 4
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UConn: 13 by 19.3. Vanderbilt: 1 by 0. Central Michigan: 2 by 20.8
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
UConn
Best efficiency game
20.8 vs Central Michigan
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Pittsburgh
2009-2010
Opening stop
Massachusetts
2012
Final stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 29 | 23.8 | 6.8 | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 49 | 24.2 | 5.8 | 20 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Massachusetts | 33 | 13.4 | 14.9 | -16 |
#1 Featured game
@ UConn
Week 1 · L 0-37
Loss with 30 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
30
Scrimmage Yards
73.1 takeover
30 scrimmage yards and 39.4 usage.
#2
vs Youngstown State
Week 1 · W 38-3
18
Scrimmage Yards
55.5 takeover
Win with 18 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
18 scrimmage yards and 10.2 usage.
#3
vs Rutgers
Week 8 · W 41-21 · Conference game
17
Scrimmage Yards
53.7 takeover
Win with 17 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
17 scrimmage yards and 9.8 usage.
#4
vs Florida International
Week 5 · W 44-17
12
Scrimmage Yards
43.1 takeover
Win with 12 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
12 scrimmage yards and 5.9 usage.
#5
vs South Florida
Week 8 · W 41-14 · Conference game
9
Scrimmage Yards
30.8 takeover
Win with 9 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
9 scrimmage yards and 6.6 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2010 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
49 primary output · 24.2 efficiency · 5.8 usage
46.7
#2
2009 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
41.6
29 primary · 23.8 efficiency · 6.8 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · Massachusetts
36.7
33 primary · 13.4 efficiency · 14.9 usage
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.