Usage / Role
36%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2009-2012Purdue
QB • 6'5" • Metamora, IL, USA
Caleb TerBush is a balanced quarterback profile with 18.1 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage / Role
36%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
35
Developing production for a quarterback
Reliability
35
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
46
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2011 Postseason · Purdue
Snapshot
Player Story
Caleb TerBush built his college career from 2009 through 2012 as a quarterback from Metamora, IL wearing No. 19, spending time with Purdue. The clearest part of Caleb TerBush's career was his passing role: 3,077...
Read the storyCaleb TerBush, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2011 Postseason · Purdue. Caleb TerBush is a balanced quarterback profile with 18.1 usage in the latest tracked season.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Total Offense | Pass Yds | Rush Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Purdue | 1 | 14 | 22 | -8 | 0 | 38.9 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Purdue | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2011 Postseason | Purdue | 13 | 94 | 101 | -7 | 1 | 68.3 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Purdue | 13 | 2,030 | 1,804 | 226 | 13 | 68.3 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Purdue | 8 | 1,213 | 1,150 | 63 | 14 | 52.3 |
Related Context
Caleb TerBush played QB for Purdue. Across 4 tracked seasons, Caleb TerBush recorded 3,077 passing yards, 274 rushing yards, and 28 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2011 with Purdue.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason
Purdue paired 2,124 primary output with 59.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 51 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2012 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Marshall
Win with 310 yards of offense and 62.1 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
8
Primary Metric / G
151.6
Efficiency
51
Usage
18.1
Consistency
61
Best Game by takeover score
Marshall
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Notre Dame: 106. Eastern Michigan: 164. Marshall: 310. Michigan: 102. Wisconsin: 69. Ohio State: 244. Minnesota: 43. Penn State: 175
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Notre Dame: 23 by 50.5. Eastern Michigan: 32 by 53.1. Marshall: 45 by 62.1. Michigan: 31 by 45.8. Wisconsin: 22 by 40.1. Ohio State: 38 by 57.8. Minnesota: 23 by 32.1. Penn State: 24 by 66.1
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Marshall
Best efficiency game
66.1 vs Penn State
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/3 | vs Penn State | L 9-34 | 10 | 20 | 155 | 50.0 | 1 | 0 | 66.1 | 4 | 20 | 5 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Minnesota | L 28-44 | 5 | 18 | 49 | 27.8 | 1 | 1 | 32.1 | 5 | -6 | -1.20 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Ohio State | L 22-29 | 19 | 30 | 230 | 63.3 | 2 | 1 | 57.8 | 8 | 14 | 1.80 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Wisconsin | L 14-38 | 7 | 16 | 80 | 43.8 | 0 | 1 | 40.1 | 6 | -11 | -1.80 | 1 | 5 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Michigan | L 13-44 | 16 | 25 | 105 | 64.0 | 1 | 1 | 45.8 | 6 | -3 | -0.50 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Marshall3+ TD | W 51-41 | 27 | 37 | 294 | 73.0 | 4 | 1 | 62.1 | 8 | 16 | 2 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Eastern Michigan3+ TD | W 54-16 | 16 | 24 | 158 | 66.7 | 2 | 1 | 53.1 | 8 | 6 | 0.80 | 1 | 9 |
| Sat 9/8 | @ Notre Dame | L 17-20 | 8 | 19 | 79 | 42.1 | 1 | 2 | 50.5 | 4 | 27 | 6.80 | 0 | 15 |
Player Story
Caleb TerBush built his college career from 2009 through 2012 as a quarterback from Metamora, IL wearing No. 19, spending time with Purdue. The clearest part of Caleb TerBush's career was his passing role: 3,077 passing yards, 25 touchdown passes, 476 attempts, and 274 rushing yards across 22 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2011 with Purdue. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
Quarterback careers are usually judged first by volume, efficiency, and scoring chances. His career also includes 274 rushing yards, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. With 22 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across Purdue.
The arc is straightforward: Caleb TerBush moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Purdue
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Purdue | 14 | 39.6 | 6.9 | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Purdue | 0 | — | — | -14 |
| 2011 Postseason | Purdue | 2,124 | 59.8 | 16.2 | 2,124 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Purdue | 2,124 | 59.8 | 16.2 | 0 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Purdue | 1,213 | 51 | 18.1 | -911 |
#1 Featured game
@ Rice
Week 2 · L 22-24
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
251
Total Offense
83.8 takeover
251 total offense with 62.4 efficiency.
#2
@ Indiana
Week 13 · W 33-25 · Conference game
240
Total Offense
66.6 takeover
Win with 240 yards of offense and 72 efficiency.
240 total offense with 72 efficiency.
#3
vs Marshall
Week 5 · W 51-41
310
Total Offense
65.9 takeover
Win with 310 yards of offense and 62.1 efficiency.
310 total offense with 62.1 efficiency.
#4
vs Middle Tennessee
Week 1 · W 27-24
240
Total Offense
65 takeover
Win with 240 yards of offense and 55.8 efficiency.
240 total offense with 55.8 efficiency.
#5
@ Michigan
Week 9 · L 14-36 · Conference game
194
Total Offense
64.2 takeover
Loss with 194 yards of offense and 92.3 efficiency.
194 total offense with 92.3 efficiency.
#1 Season by Season Value
2011 Postseason · Purdue
2,124 primary output · 59.8 efficiency · 16.2 usage
68.3
#2
2011 Regular Season · Purdue
68.3
2,124 primary · 59.8 efficiency · 16.2 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · Purdue
52.3
1,213 primary · 51 efficiency · 18.1 usage
1
250+ passing yards
1
300+ total offense
2
3+ TD games
7
Above avg efficiency
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.