Usage Score
18.1
Player Profile
Roy Roundtree
WR • 6'0" • Trotwood, OH, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Roy Roundtree reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
81.5
Consistency
38.1
Season Value
50.7
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Michigan
09101011111212
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Primary stop by seasons
- Michigan
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Michigan
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Purdue
Roy Roundtree, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Michigan. Roy Roundtree reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
Michigan paired 935 primary output with 60.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 81.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Northwestern
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2012 Postseason · Michigan
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
44.6
Efficiency
81.5
Usage
18.1
Consistency
38.1
Best Game by takeover score
South Carolina
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. South Carolina: 27. Alabama: 12. Air Force: 5. Massachusetts: 25. Notre Dame: 30. Purdue: 23. Illinois: 33. Michigan State: 15. Nebraska: 32. Minnesota: 64. Northwestern: 139. Iowa: 83. Ohio State: 92
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. South Carolina: 3 by 60. Alabama: 2 by 40. Air Force: 1 by 33.3. Massachusetts: 2 by 83.3. Notre Dame: 3 by 66.7. Purdue: 2 by 76.7. Illinois: 1 by 100. Michigan State: 1 by 100. Nebraska: 1 by 100. Minnesota: 2 by 100. Northwestern: 5 by 100. Iowa: 5 by 100. Ohio State: 3 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins48.4 · n=8 · +9.8 vs Losses
Losses38.6 · n=5 · -9.8 vs Wins
First Half22.1 · n=7 · -48.7 vs Second Half
Second Half70.8 · n=6 · +48.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Northwestern
Best efficiency game
100 vs Ohio State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/1 | vs South Carolina | L 28-33 | — | 3 | 27 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 11/24 | @ Ohio State | L 21-26 | — | 3 | 92 | 30.7 | 30.70 | 1 | 75 |
| Sat 11/17 | vs Iowa | W 42-17 | — | 5 | 83 | 16.6 | 16.60 | 1 | 37 |
| Sat 11/10 | vs Northwestern100 receiving yards | W 38-31 | — | 5 | 139 | 27.8 | 27.80 | 0 | 53 |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Minnesota | W 35-13 | — | 2 | 64 | 32 | 32 | 0 | 47 |
| Sun 10/28 | @ Nebraska | L 9-23 | — | 1 | 32 | 32 | 32 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 10/20 | vs Michigan State | W 12-10 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Illinois | W 45-0 | — | 1 | 33 | 33 | 33 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Purdue | W 44-13 | — | 2 | 23 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/22 | @ Notre Dame | L 6-13 | — | 3 | 30 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Massachusetts | W 63-13 | — | 2 | 25 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 1 | 18 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Air Force | W 31-25 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sun 9/2 | @ Alabama | L 14-41 | — | 2 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 7 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Michigan
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
2009201020102011201120122012
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Michigan | 434 | 80.5 | 29.7 | — |
| 2010 Postseason | Michigan | 935 | 60.7 | 30.6 | 501 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Michigan | 935 | 60.7 | 30.6 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Michigan | 342 | 85.6 | 15.6 | -593 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Michigan | 342 | 85.6 | 15.6 | 0 |
| 2012 Postseason | Michigan | 580 | 81.5 | 18.1 | 238 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Michigan | 580 | 81.5 | 18.1 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Purdue
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
126
Primary metric
126 receiving yards with a 84 efficiency score.
#2
Illinois
246
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
246 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Northwestern
139
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
139 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Northwestern
83
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
83 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Ohio State
116
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
116 receiving yards with a 85.9 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2010 Postseason · Michigan
935 primary output · 60.7 efficiency · 30.6 usage
58.6
#2
2010 Regular Season · Michigan
58.6
935 primary · 60.7 efficiency · 30.6 usage
#3
2009 Regular Season · Michigan
54.1
434 primary · 80.5 efficiency · 29.7 usage
Milestones
7
100+ receiving yards
6
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2020 · Rating 0.78
Clarke Prep School · Grove Hill, AL
- Committed To
- —
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2020
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,291
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 42 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.