Usage / Role
71%
Major offensive role
Player Dossier
2009-2012Massachusetts
RB • 6'0" • Dorchester, MA, USA
Michael Cox leans workhorse runner traits and 33 efficiency.
Usage / Role
71%
Major offensive role
Impact Production
53
Solid production for a back
Reliability
48
Useful contributor with volatile peaks
Star Power
73
High-upside career profile
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2012 Regular Season · Massachusetts
Snapshot
Player Story
Michael Cox built his college career from 2009 through 2012 as a running back from Dorchester, MA wearing No. 5, spending time with Massachusetts and Michigan. The clearest part of Michael Cox's career was his...
Read the storyNFL Draft
Michael Cox, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2012 Regular Season · Massachusetts. Michael Cox leans workhorse runner traits and 33 efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Michigan | 2 | 124 | 113 | 11 | 2 | 50.8 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Michigan | 1 | 56 | 56 | 0 | 0 | 54.5 |
| 2011 Postseason | Michigan | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Massachusetts | 12 | 773 | 710 | 63 | 5 | 69.4 |
Related Context
Michael Cox played RB for Michigan and Massachusetts. Across 4 tracked seasons, Michael Cox recorded 879 rushing yards, 74 receiving yards, and 7 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2012 with Massachusetts.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season
Massachusetts paired 773 primary output with 33 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 33 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2012 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Michigan, Massachusetts.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Miami (OH)
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Scrimmage Yards / G
64.4
Efficiency
33
Usage
31.6
Consistency
54.2
Best Game by takeover score
Miami (OH)
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UConn: -4. Indiana: 34. Michigan: 76. Miami (OH): 188. Ohio: 80. Western Michigan: 19. Bowling Green: 37. Vanderbilt: 105. Northern Illinois: 93. Akron: 44. Buffalo: 32. Central Michigan: 69
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UConn: 5 by 0. Indiana: 19 by 22.5. Michigan: 18 by 44. Miami (OH): 30 by 65.3. Ohio: 22 by 37.9. Western Michigan: 12 by 17.4. Bowling Green: 11 by 37.1. Vanderbilt: 20 by 42.5. Northern Illinois: 27 by 34.6. Akron: 15 by 30.6. Buffalo: 14 by 24.4. Central Michigan: 18 by 40.2
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Miami (OH)
Best efficiency game
65.3 vs Miami (OH)
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/23 | vs Central Michigan | L 21-42 | 17 | 66 | 3.90 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3.8 |
| Sat 11/17 | vs Buffalo | L 19-29 | 13 | 31 | 2.40 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2.3 |
| Sat 11/10 | @ Akron | W 22-14 | 15 | 44 | 2.90 | 0 | — | — | 2.9 |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Northern Illinois | L 0-63 | 25 | 81 | 3.20 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 3.4 |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Vanderbilt | L 7-49 | 17 | 56 | 3.30 | 0 | 3 | 49 | 5.3 |
| Sat 10/20 | vs Bowling Green | L 0-24 | 10 | 37 | 3.70 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3.4 |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Western Michigan | L 14-52 | 11 | 19 | 1.70 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1.6 |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Ohio | L 34-37 | 22 | 80 | 3.60 | 0 | — | — | 3.6 |
| Sat 9/22 | @ Miami (OH)100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | L 16-27 | 30 | 188 | 6.30 | 2 | — | — | 6.3 |
| Sat 9/15 | @ Michigan | L 13-63 | 18 | 76 | 4.20 | 0 | — | — | 4.2 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Indiana | L 6-45 | 15 | 36 | 2.40 | 0 | 4 | -2 | 1.8 |
| Thu 8/30 | @ UConn | L 0-37 | 5 | -4 | -0.80 | 0 | — | — | -0.8 |
Player Story
Michael Cox built his college career from 2009 through 2012 as a running back from Dorchester, MA wearing No. 5, spending time with Massachusetts and Michigan. The clearest part of Michael Cox's career was his backfield work: 879 rushing yards, 217 carries, 7 rushing touchdowns, and 74 receiving yards across 16 career games in the available record. His career also includes 74 receiving yards and 2 return yards, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. That gives Michael Cox's career enough real context without stretching the story beyond the available production.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Michigan
2009-2011
Opening stop
Massachusetts
2012
Final stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Michigan | 124 | 89.5 | 10.9 | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Michigan | 56 | 88.9 | 7.6 | -68 |
| 2011 Postseason | Michigan | 0 | — | 0 | -56 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Massachusetts | 773 | 33 | 31.6 | 773 |
#1 Featured game
@ Miami (OH)
Week 4 · L 16-27 · Conference game
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load.
188
Scrimmage Yards
88.4 takeover
188 scrimmage yards and 43.5 usage.
#2
vs Delaware State
Week 7 · W 63-6
93
Scrimmage Yards
76.2 takeover
Win with 93 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
93 scrimmage yards and 17.4 usage.
#3
vs Bowling Green
Week 4 · W 65-21
56
Scrimmage Yards
70.2 takeover
Win with 56 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
56 scrimmage yards and 7.6 usage.
#4
@ Vanderbilt
Week 9 · L 7-49
105
Scrimmage Yards
66.1 takeover
Loss with 105 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
105 scrimmage yards and 36.4 usage.
#5
@ Michigan
Week 3 · L 13-63
76
Scrimmage Yards
61.5 takeover
Loss with 76 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
76 scrimmage yards and 35.3 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2012 Regular Season · Massachusetts
773 primary output · 33 efficiency · 31.6 usage
69.4
#2
2010 Regular Season · Michigan
54.5
56 primary · 88.9 efficiency · 7.6 usage
#3
2009 Regular Season · Michigan
50.8
124 primary · 89.5 efficiency · 10.9 usage
1
100+ rush yards
1
150+ scrimmage yards
2
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.