Usage Score
26.2
Player Profile
Jeremiah Masoli
QB • 5'11" • Daly City, CA, USA
Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator
Jeremiah Masoli is a balanced quarterback profile with 26.2 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
61.5
Consistency
71.3
Season Value
63.2
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Oregon
0808090910
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Primary stop by seasons
- Oregon
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Oregon
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Arizona
Jeremiah Masoli, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Oregon. Jeremiah Masoli is a balanced quarterback profile with 26.2 usage in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
Oregon paired 2,815 primary output with 64.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 61.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Oregon, Ole Miss.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Regular Season · Ole Miss
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
215.3
Efficiency
61.5
Usage
26.2
Consistency
71.3
Best Game by takeover score
Mississippi State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 138. Tulane: 308. Vanderbilt: 294. Fresno State: 212. Kentucky: 133. Alabama: 150. Arkansas: 425. Auburn: 218. Louisiana: 89. Tennessee: 102. LSU: 241. Mississippi State: 273
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 15 by 69.7. Tulane: 29 by 70. Vanderbilt: 54 by 57.9. Fresno State: 20 by 76.8. Kentucky: 26 by 61.2. Alabama: 50 by 49.5. Arkansas: 51 by 74.8. Auburn: 47 by 54.2. Louisiana: 11 by 73.5. Tennessee: 25 by 35.2. LSU: 34 by 63.2. Mississippi State: 55 by 51.4
Split Comparison
Wins185.5 · n=4 · -57.8 vs Losses
Losses243.3 · n=7 · +57.8 vs Wins
First Half205.8 · n=6 · -18.8 vs Second Half
Second Half224.7 · n=6 · +18.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Arkansas
Best efficiency game
76.8 vs Fresno State
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/28 | vs Mississippi State | L 23-31 | 24 | 44 | 261 | 54.5 | 1 | 1 | 51.4 | 11 | 12 | 1.10 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 11/20 | @ LSU3+ TD · Dual-threat | L 36-43 | 15 | 23 | 177 | 65.2 | 1 | 2 | 63.2 | 11 | 64 | 5.80 | 2 | 22 |
| Sat 11/13 | @ Tennessee | L 14-52 | 7 | 18 | 80 | 38.9 | 0 | 3 | 35.2 | 7 | 22 | 3.10 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 11/6 | vs Louisiana | W 43-21 | 5 | 8 | 72 | 62.5 | 1 | 0 | 73.5 | 3 | 17 | 5.70 | 1 | 6 |
| Sat 10/30 | vs Auburn | L 31-51 | 20 | 33 | 189 | 60.6 | 1 | 1 | 54.2 | 14 | 29 | 2.10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/23 | @ Arkansas300-yard game · 3+ TD | L 24-38 | 21 | 36 | 327 | 58.3 | 3 | 0 | 74.8 | 15 | 98 | 6.50 | 0 | 46 |
| Sun 10/17 | @ Alabama | L 10-23 | 18 | 40 | 110 | 45.0 | 1 | 1 | 49.5 | 10 | 40 | 4 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 10/2 | vs Kentucky3+ TD | W 42-35 | 9 | 17 | 90 | 52.9 | 3 | 0 | 61.2 | 9 | 43 | 4.80 | 1 | 17 |
| Sat 9/25 | vs Fresno StateDual-threat | W 55-38 | 8 | 12 | 153 | 66.7 | 2 | 1 | 76.8 | 8 | 59 | 7.40 | 0 | 56 |
| Sat 9/18 | vs VanderbiltDual-threat | L 14-28 | 19 | 35 | 190 | 54.3 | 0 | 2 | 57.9 | 19 | 104 | 5.50 | 1 | 28 |
| Sun 9/12 | @ Tulane | W 27-13 | 14 | 20 | 281 | 70.0 | 1 | 1 | 70 | 9 | 27 | 3 | 1 | 9 |
| Sat 9/4 | vs Unknown | — | 7 | 10 | 109 | 70.0 | 0 | 1 | 69.7 | 5 | 29 | 5.80 | 0 | 16 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Oregon
2008-2009
Opening stop
- 2
Ole Miss
2010
Final stop
Season Progression
20082008200920092010
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Postseason | Oregon | 2,462 | 66.7 | 25.4 | — |
| 2008 Regular Season | Oregon | 2,462 | 66.7 | 25.4 | 0 |
| 2009 Postseason | Oregon | 2,815 | 64.4 | 26 | 353 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Oregon | 2,815 | 64.4 | 26 | 0 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 2,583 | 61.5 | 26.2 | -232 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Arizona
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
387
Primary metric
387 total offense with 91.3 efficiency.
#2
Arkansas
425
Primary metric
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
425 total offense with 74.8 efficiency.
#3
USC
386
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
386 total offense with 80.2 efficiency.
#4
Oklahoma State
364
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
364 total offense with 69.3 efficiency.
#5
Stanford
389
Primary metric
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
389 total offense with 71.7 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2009 Postseason · Oregon
2,815 primary output · 64.4 efficiency · 26 usage
65.5
#2
2009 Regular Season · Oregon
65.5
2,815 primary · 64.4 efficiency · 26 usage
#3
2010 Regular Season · Ole Miss
63.2
2,583 primary · 61.5 efficiency · 26.2 usage
Milestones
11
250+ passing yards
8
300+ total offense
2
3+ takeover TD games
23
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
7,860
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.