Usage / Role
100%
Featured offensive role
Player Dossier
2008-2010Clemson
RB • 6'0" • Jacksonville, FL, USA
Jamie Harper leans workhorse runner traits and 42.5 efficiency.
Usage / Role
100%
Featured offensive role
Impact Production
76
High-end production for a back
Reliability
100
Regular contributor with several takeover games
Star Power
65
Useful peak profile
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2010 Postseason · Clemson
Snapshot
Player Story
Jamie Harper built his college career from 2008 through 2010 as a running back from Jacksonville, FL wearing No. 8, spending time with Clemson. The clearest part of Jamie Harper's career was his backfield work: 1,311...
Read the storyNFL Draft
Jamie Harper, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2010 Postseason · Clemson. Jamie Harper leans workhorse runner traits and 42.5 efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Clemson | 8 | 154 | 133 | 21 | 1 | 31.7 |
| 2009 Postseason | Clemson | 14 | 79 | 79 | 0 | 1 | 39.2 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Clemson | 14 | 388 | 339 | 49 | 3 | 39.2 |
| 2010 Postseason | Clemson | 13 | 46 | 34 | 12 | 1 | 76 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Clemson | 13 | 1,034 | 726 | 308 | 9 | 76 |
Related Context
Jamie Harper played RB for Clemson. Across 3 tracked seasons, Jamie Harper recorded 1,311 rushing yards, 390 receiving yards, and 15 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2010 with Clemson.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
Clemson paired 1,080 primary output with 42.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 42.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Wake Forest
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 92.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
83.1
Efficiency
42.5
Usage
33.5
Consistency
65.5
Best Game by takeover score
Wake Forest
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. South Florida: 46. North Texas: 109. Presbyterian: 12. Auburn: 92. Miami: 83. North Carolina: 28. Maryland: 48. Georgia Tech: 94. Boston College: 26. NC State: 94. Florida State: 197. Wake Forest: 181. South Carolina: 70
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. South Florida: 26 by 18. North Texas: 10 by 95.4. Presbyterian: 4 by 31.3. Auburn: 22 by 31.9. Miami: 22 by 35.5. North Carolina: 12 by 25.1. Maryland: 9 by 28.5. Georgia Tech: 13 by 61.9. Boston College: 8 by 35.4. NC State: 28 by 29. Florida State: 36 by 55.9. Wake Forest: 27 by 64.9. South Carolina: 17 by 39.8
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Wake Forest
Best efficiency game
95.4 vs North Texas
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/31 | vs South Florida | L 26-31 | 20 | 34 | 1.70 | 1 | 6 | 12 | 1.8 |
| Sun 11/28 | vs South Carolina | L 7-29 | 16 | 58 | 3.60 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 4.1 |
| Sat 11/20 | @ Wake Forest100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 30-10 | 24 | 142 | 5.90 | 1 | 3 | 39 | 6.7 |
| Sun 11/14 | @ Florida State100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | L 13-16 | 27 | 143 | 5.30 | 1 | 9 | 54 | 5.5 |
| Sat 11/6 | vs NC State | W 14-13 | 25 | 60 | 2.40 | 1 | 3 | 34 | 3.4 |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Boston College | L 10-16 | 6 | 21 | 3.50 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 3.3 |
| Sat 10/23 | vs Georgia Tech | W 27-13 | 11 | 56 | 5.10 | 0 | 2 | 38 | 7.2 |
| Sat 10/16 | vs Maryland | W 31-7 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 40 | 5.3 |
| Sat 10/9 | @ North Carolina | L 16-21 | 11 | 27 | 2.50 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2.3 |
| Sat 10/2 | vs Miami | L 21-30 | 18 | 57 | 3.20 | 0 | 4 | 26 | 3.8 |
| Sat 9/18 | @ Auburn2+ TD | L 24-27 | 19 | 44 | 2.30 | 0 | 3 | 48 | 4.2 |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Presbyterian | W 58-21 | 3 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 |
| Sat 9/4 | vs North Texas100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 35-10 | 9 | 101 | 11.20 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 10.9 |
Player Story
Jamie Harper built his college career from 2008 through 2010 as a running back from Jacksonville, FL wearing No. 8, spending time with Clemson. The clearest part of Jamie Harper's career was his backfield work: 1,311 rushing yards, 311 carries, 12 rushing touchdowns, and 390 receiving yards across 35 career games in the available record. His career also includes 390 receiving yards and 64 return yards, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. That gives Jamie Harper's career enough real context without stretching the story beyond the available production.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Clemson
2008-2010
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Clemson | 154 | 35.2 | 8.9 | — |
| 2009 Postseason | Clemson | 467 | 42 | 12.8 | 313 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Clemson | 467 | 42 | 12.8 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | Clemson | 1,080 | 42.5 | 33.5 | 613 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Clemson | 1,080 | 42.5 | 33.5 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
@ Wake Forest
Week 12 · W 30-10 · Conference game
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
181
Scrimmage Yards
85.6 takeover
181 scrimmage yards and 43.5 usage.
#2
@ Florida State
Week 11 · L 13-16 · Conference game
197
Scrimmage Yards
85.3 takeover
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load.
197 scrimmage yards and 57.1 usage.
#3
vs Kentucky
Week 1 · W 21-13 · Postseason
79
Scrimmage Yards
79.2 takeover
Win with 79 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
79 scrimmage yards and 20.5 usage.
#4
vs Coastal Carolina
Week 9 · W 49-3
85
Scrimmage Yards
78.7 takeover
Win with 85 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
85 scrimmage yards and 28 usage.
#5
vs North Texas
Week 1 · W 35-10
109
Scrimmage Yards
77.5 takeover
Win with 109 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
109 scrimmage yards and 28.6 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2010 Postseason · Clemson
1,080 primary output · 42.5 efficiency · 33.5 usage
76
#2
2010 Regular Season · Clemson
76
1,080 primary · 42.5 efficiency · 33.5 usage
#3
2009 Postseason · Clemson
39.2
467 primary · 42 efficiency · 12.8 usage
3
100+ rush yards
2
150+ scrimmage yards
2
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.