Usage Score
20.3
Player Dossier
2008-2011Colorado
Tyler Hansen
QB • 6'1" • Murrieta, CA, USA
Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator
Tyler Hansen is a balanced quarterback profile with 20.3 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
55.7
Consistency
75.2
Season Value
62.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · Colorado
08091011
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Colorado
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Texas A&M
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tyler Hansen, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · Colorado. Tyler Hansen is a balanced quarterback profile with 20.3 usage in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season
Colorado paired 2,998 primary output with 55.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 55.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2011 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: California
Loss with 500 yards of offense and 68.7 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2011 Regular Season · Colorado
Games
13
Primary Metric / G
230.6
Efficiency
55.7
Usage
20.3
Consistency
75.2
Best Game by takeover score
Utah
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Hawai'i: 188. California: 500. Colorado State: 241. Ohio State: 241. Washington State: 183. Stanford: 221. Washington: 134. Oregon: 68. Arizona State: 270. USC: 295. Arizona: 263. UCLA: 126. Utah: 268
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Hawai'i: 40 by 50.5. California: 56 by 68.7. Colorado State: 40 by 60.4. Ohio State: 42 by 54.3. Washington State: 32 by 55. Stanford: 35 by 56.9. Washington: 34 by 50.8. Oregon: 19 by 42.4. Arizona State: 40 by 52. USC: 40 by 75.6. Arizona: 36 by 66.1. UCLA: 36 by 36.8. Utah: 43 by 54.2
Split Comparison
Wins257.3 · n=3 · +34.7 vs Losses
Losses222.6 · n=10 · -34.7 vs Wins
First Half244 · n=7 · +29 vs Second Half
Second Half215 · n=6 · -29 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
California
Best efficiency game
75.6 vs USC
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/25 | @ Utah | W 17-14 | 22 | 36 | 264 | 61.1 | 1 | 1 | 54.2 | 7 | 4 | 0.60 | 1 | 8 |
| Sun 11/20 | @ UCLA | L 6-45 | 16 | 31 | 127 | 51.6 | 1 | 3 | 36.8 | 5 | -1 | -0.20 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs ArizonaDual-threat | W 48-29 | 16 | 26 | 213 | 61.5 | 2 | 1 | 66.1 | 10 | 50 | 5 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs USC | L 17-42 | 17 | 37 | 250 | 45.9 | 2 | 0 | 75.6 | 3 | 45 | 15 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Arizona State | L 14-48 | 22 | 35 | 285 | 62.9 | 1 | 2 | 52 | 5 | -15 | -3 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Oregon | L 2-45 | 7 | 15 | 62 | 46.7 | 0 | 1 | 42.4 | 4 | 6 | 1.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Washington | L 24-52 | 18 | 30 | 155 | 60.0 | 1 | 0 | 50.8 | 4 | -21 | -5.30 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Stanford | L 7-48 | 15 | 29 | 202 | 51.7 | 1 | 1 | 56.9 | 6 | 19 | 3.20 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Washington State | L 27-31 | 15 | 23 | 175 | 65.2 | 2 | 1 | 55 | 9 | 8 | 0.90 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Ohio State | L 17-37 | 22 | 39 | 238 | 56.4 | 2 | 0 | 54.3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Colorado State3+ TD | W 28-14 | 17 | 32 | 215 | 53.1 | 2 | 0 | 60.4 | 8 | 26 | 3.30 | 2 | 19 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs California300-yard game · 3+ TD | L 33-36 | 28 | 49 | 474 | 57.1 | 3 | 0 | 68.7 | 7 | 26 | 3.70 | 0 | 7 |
| Sun 9/4 | @ Hawai'i | L 17-34 | 16 | 30 | 223 | 53.3 | 2 | 1 | 50.5 | 10 | -35 | -3.50 | 0 | 8 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Colorado
2008-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
2008200920102011
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Colorado | 541 | 48.6 | 31.9 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Colorado | 1,501 | 52.4 | 33 | 960 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Colorado | 1,143 | 57.1 | 18.1 | -358 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Colorado | 2,998 | 55.7 | 20.3 | 1,855 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Texas A&M
Win with 316 yards of offense and 61.5 efficiency.
316
Primary metric
316 total offense with 61.5 efficiency.
#2
Iowa State
308
Primary metric
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
308 total offense with 58.8 efficiency.
#3
California
500
Primary metric
Loss with 500 yards of offense and 68.7 efficiency.
500 total offense with 68.7 efficiency.
#4
Texas A&M
175
Primary metric
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
175 total offense with 49.8 efficiency.
#5
Georgia
209
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
209 total offense with 65.5 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2011 Regular Season · Colorado
2,998 primary output · 55.7 efficiency · 20.3 usage
62.5
#2
2009 Regular Season · Colorado
51.8
1,501 primary · 52.4 efficiency · 33 usage
#3
2010 Regular Season · Colorado
48
1,143 primary · 57.1 efficiency · 18.1 usage
Milestones
8
250+ passing yards
3
300+ total offense
1
3+ takeover TD games
8
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
6,183
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 33 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.