Usage / Role
83%
Major offensive role
Player Dossier
2009-2012SMU
RB • 6'1" • Oxford, MI, USA
Zach Line leans workhorse runner traits and 48.4 efficiency.
Usage / Role
83%
Major offensive role
Impact Production
100
Top-tier box-score impact for a back
Reliability
95
Regular contributor with several takeover games
Star Power
85
Elite ceiling indicators
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2010 Postseason · SMU
Snapshot
Player Story
Zach Line built his college career from 2009 through 2012 as a running back from Oxford, MI wearing No. 48, spending time with SMU. The clearest part of Zach Line's career was his backfield work: 4,185 rushing yards,...
Read the storyZach Line, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2010 Postseason · SMU. Zach Line leans workhorse runner traits and 48.4 efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Postseason | SMU | 13 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 36.5 |
| 2009 Regular Season | SMU | 13 | 248 | 180 | 68 | 6 | 36.5 |
| 2010 Postseason | SMU | 14 | 108 | 103 | 5 | 0 | 84.1 |
| 2010 Regular Season | SMU | 14 | 1,549 | 1,391 | 158 | 10 | 84.1 |
| 2011 Regular Season | SMU | 10 | 1,363 | 1,224 | 139 | 17 | 82.7 |
| 2012 Postseason | SMU | 13 | 69 | 71 | -2 | 1 | 78.8 |
| 2012 Regular Season | SMU | 13 | 1,438 | 1,207 | 231 | 12 | 78.8 |
Related Context
Zach Line played RB for SMU. Across 4 tracked seasons, Zach Line recorded 4,185 rushing yards, 599 receiving yards, and 47 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2010 with SMU.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
SMU paired 1,657 primary output with 64.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 62 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Southern Miss
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 90th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
10
Scrimmage Yards / G
136.3
Efficiency
62
Usage
46.5
Consistency
86.4
Best Game by takeover score
Southern Miss
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas A&M: 151. UTEP: 116. Northwestern State: 92. Memphis: 161. TCU: 140. UCF: 82. Southern Miss: 163. Tulsa: 169. Tulane: 147. Navy: 142
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas A&M: 24 by 62.6. UTEP: 21 by 58.6. Northwestern State: 17 by 55.8. Memphis: 22 by 73. TCU: 22 by 62.2. UCF: 16 by 53.4. Southern Miss: 22 by 77.2. Tulsa: 25 by 61.7. Tulane: 27 by 58.4. Navy: 27 by 57.1
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Southern Miss
Best efficiency game
77.2 vs Southern Miss
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/12 | vs Navy100 rush yards | L 17-24 | 24 | 135 | 5.60 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 5.3 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Tulane100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 45-24 | 25 | 143 | 5.70 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 5.4 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Tulsa100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | L 7-38 | 22 | 118 | 5.40 | 1 | 3 | 51 | 6.8 |
| Sun 10/23 | @ Southern Miss100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | L 3-27 | 22 | 163 | 7.40 | 0 | — | — | 7.4 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs UCF2+ TD | W 38-17 | 16 | 82 | 5.10 | 2 | — | — | 5.1 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ TCU100 rush yards | W 40-33 | 21 | 120 | 5.70 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 6.4 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Memphis100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 42-0 | 20 | 136 | 6.80 | 3 | 2 | 25 | 7.3 |
| Sun 9/18 | vs Northwestern State2+ TD | W 40-7 | 16 | 85 | 5.30 | 5 | 1 | 7 | 5.4 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs UTEP100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 28-17 | 20 | 114 | 5.70 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5.5 |
| Sun 9/4 | @ Texas A&M100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | L 14-46 | 22 | 128 | 5.80 | 1 | 2 | 23 | 6.3 |
Player Story
Zach Line built his college career from 2009 through 2012 as a running back from Oxford, MI wearing No. 48, spending time with SMU. The clearest part of Zach Line's career was his backfield work: 4,185 rushing yards, 778 carries, 47 rushing touchdowns, and 599 receiving yards across 50 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2012 with SMU. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
The value of the career arc is that it connects production to role, not just a name on a roster. His career also includes 599 receiving yards, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. With 50 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across SMU.
The arc is straightforward: Zach Line moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
SMU
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Postseason | SMU | 257 | 41.6 | 9 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | SMU | 257 | 41.6 | 9 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | SMU | 1,657 | 64.7 | 36.9 | 1,400 |
| 2010 Regular Season | SMU | 1,657 | 64.7 | 36.9 | 0 |
| 2011 Regular Season | SMU | 1,363 | 62 | 46.5 | -294 |
| 2012 Postseason | SMU | 1,507 | 48.4 | 46.4 | 144 |
| 2012 Regular Season | SMU | 1,507 | 48.4 | 46.4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
@ Southern Miss
Week 8 · L 3-27 · Conference game
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load.
163
Scrimmage Yards
91.2 takeover
163 scrimmage yards and 55 usage.
#2
vs Marshall
Week 12 · W 31-17 · Conference game
228
Scrimmage Yards
90.6 takeover
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
228 scrimmage yards and 61.5 usage.
#3
@ Memphis
Week 4 · W 42-0 · Conference game
161
Scrimmage Yards
89.4 takeover
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
161 scrimmage yards and 38.6 usage.
#4
@ Tulane
Week 7 · L 26-27 · Conference game
204
Scrimmage Yards
89 takeover
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load.
204 scrimmage yards and 49.2 usage.
#5
@ Tulsa
Week 9 · L 7-38 · Conference game
169
Scrimmage Yards
87.2 takeover
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load.
169 scrimmage yards and 56.8 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2010 Postseason · SMU
1,657 primary output · 64.7 efficiency · 36.9 usage
84.1
#2
2010 Regular Season · SMU
84.1
1,657 primary · 64.7 efficiency · 36.9 usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · SMU
82.7
1,363 primary · 62 efficiency · 46.5 usage
20
100+ rush yards
10
150+ scrimmage yards
13
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.