Usage / Role
32%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2008-2011SMU
WR • 5'9" • Little Elm, TX, USA
Cole Beasley reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage / Role
32%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
52
Solid production for a receiver
Reliability
41
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
64
Useful peak profile
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2011 Postseason · SMU
Snapshot
Player Story
Cole Beasley built his college career from 2008 through 2011 as a wide receiver from Little Elm, TX wearing No. 11, spending time with SMU. The clearest part of Cole Beasley's career was his receiving role: 255...
Read the storyCole Beasley, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2011 Postseason · SMU. Cole Beasley reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | SMU | 10 | 42 | 366 | 3 | 52.6 |
| 2009 Postseason | SMU | 11 | 3 | 88 | 1 | 57.5 |
| 2009 Regular Season | SMU | 11 | 37 | 405 | 2 | 57.5 |
| 2010 Postseason | SMU | 14 | 3 | 24 | 0 | 83.5 |
| 2010 Regular Season | SMU | 14 | 84 | 1,036 | 6 | 83.5 |
| 2011 Postseason | SMU | 12 | 7 | 86 | 0 | 87.2 |
| 2011 Regular Season | SMU | 12 | 79 | 954 | 3 | 87.2 |
Related Context
Cole Beasley played WR for SMU. Across 4 tracked seasons, Cole Beasley recorded 2 rushing yards, 2,959 receiving yards, and 15 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2010 with SMU.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason
SMU paired 1,040 primary output with 79.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2008 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 52.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
36.6
Efficiency
52.3
Usage
21.6
Consistency
51.5
Best Game by takeover score
Tulsa
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Rice: 34. Texas Tech: 3. TCU: 0. UCF: 22. Tulsa: 94. Houston: 37. Navy: 25. Memphis: 66. UTEP: 24. Southern Miss: 61
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Rice: 5 by 45.3. Texas Tech: 1 by 20. UCF: 4 by 36.7. Tulsa: 8 by 78.3. Houston: 5 by 49.3. Navy: 5 by 33.3. Memphis: 6 by 73.3. UTEP: 3 by 53.3. Southern Miss: 5 by 81.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tulsa
Best efficiency game
81.3 vs Southern Miss
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/29 | vs Southern Miss | L 12-28 | — | 5 | 61 | 12.2 | 12.20 | 0 | 15 |
| Sun 11/16 | @ UTEP | L 10-36 | — | 3 | 24 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 11/8 | vs Memphis2+ TD | L 26-31 | — | 6 | 66 | 11 | 11 | 2 | 21 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ Navy | L 7-34 | — | 5 | 25 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 8 |
| Sun 10/19 | vs Houston | L 38-44 | — | 5 | 37 | 7.4 | 7.40 | 0 | 15 |
| Sun 10/12 | vs TulsaHigh volume | L 31-37 | — | 8 | 94 | 11.8 | 11.80 | 1 | 26 |
| Sat 10/4 | @ UCF | L 17-31 | — | 4 | 22 | 5.5 | 5.50 | 0 | 11 |
| Sun 9/21 | vs TCU | L 7-48 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Texas Tech | L 7-43 | — | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 8/30 | @ Rice | L 27-56 | — | 5 | 34 | 6.8 | 6.80 | 0 | 19 |
Player Story
Cole Beasley built his college career from 2008 through 2011 as a wide receiver from Little Elm, TX wearing No. 11, spending time with SMU. The clearest part of Cole Beasley's career was his receiving role: 255 catches, 2,959 receiving yards, 14 touchdowns, and 2 rushing yards across 47 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2010 with SMU. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
The value of the career arc is that it connects production to role, not just a name on a roster. His career also includes 2 rushing yards and 28 return yards, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. With 47 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across SMU.
The arc is straightforward: Cole Beasley moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
SMU
2008-2011
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | SMU | 366 | 52.3 | 21.6 | — |
| 2009 Postseason | SMU | 493 | 67.8 | 16.4 | 127 |
| 2009 Regular Season | SMU | 493 | 67.8 | 16.4 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | SMU | 1,060 | 76.7 | 28.7 | 567 |
| 2010 Regular Season | SMU | 1,060 | 76.7 | 28.7 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | SMU | 1,040 | 79.5 | 35.1 | -20 |
| 2011 Regular Season | SMU | 1,040 | 79.5 | 35.1 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
@ Marshall
Week 12 · L 31-34 · Conference game
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
94
Receiving Yards
100 takeover
94 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
@ Rice
Week 5 · W 42-31 · Conference game
158
Receiving Yards
100 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
158 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
vs Northwestern State
Week 3 · W 40-7
171
Receiving Yards
100 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
171 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
@ Tulane
Week 9 · W 31-17 · Conference game
135
Receiving Yards
95.1 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
135 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
vs Tulsa
Week 7 · L 31-37 · Conference game
94
Receiving Yards
92.8 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
94 receiving yards with a 78.3 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2011 Postseason · SMU
1,040 primary output · 79.5 efficiency · 35.1 usage
87.2
#2
2011 Regular Season · SMU
87.2
1,040 primary · 79.5 efficiency · 35.1 usage
#3
2010 Postseason · SMU
83.5
1,060 primary · 76.7 efficiency · 28.7 usage
5
100+ receiving yards
11
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.