Usage Score
1.2
Player Dossier
2015-2018Purdue
CB • 6'0" • 195 lbs • Fort Wayne, IN, USA
Antonio Blackmon shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 30.4 disruption score.
Usage Score
1.2
Efficiency
8
Consistency
4.8
Season Value
3.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Purdue
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Antonio Blackmon, CB. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Purdue. Antonio Blackmon shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 30.4 disruption score.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
Purdue paired 10.5 primary output with 30.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2018 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Nebraska
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
7
Havoc Plays / G
0.1
Efficiency
8
Usage
1.2
Consistency
4.8
Best Game by takeover score
Arizona
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arizona: 0. Ohio: 0. Michigan: 0. Minnesota: 0. Rutgers: 0. Nebraska: 1. Iowa: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arizona: 2 by 8.3. Ohio: 1 by 4.2. Michigan: 2 by 8.3. Minnesota: 2 by 8.3. Rutgers: 1 by 4.2. Nebraska: 3 by 22.5
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
7 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Nebraska
Best efficiency game
22.5 vs Nebraska
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Purdue
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Purdue | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Purdue | 2 | 11.3 | 3.3 | 2 |
| 2017 Postseason | Purdue | 1 | 8 | 1.2 | -1 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Purdue | 1 | 8 | 1.2 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Purdue | 10.5 | 30.4 | 5.3 | 9.5 |
#1 Featured game
Ohio State
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5
Primary metric
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 57.1 takeover score.
#2
Minnesota
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 44.8 takeover score.
#3
Illinois
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 42.9 takeover score.
#4
Nebraska
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 41.5 takeover score.
#5
Michigan State
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 31.1 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2018 Regular Season · Purdue
10.5 primary output · 30.4 efficiency · 5.3 usage
30
#2
2016 Regular Season · Purdue
7.2
2 primary · 11.3 efficiency · 3.3 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · Purdue
3.9
1 primary · 8 efficiency · 1.2 usage
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
80
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 25 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Antonio Blackmon quick answers