Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2009-2011TCU
? • 5'9" • Irving, TX, USA
Ed Wesley shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Usage Score
—
Efficiency
—
Consistency
44.4
Season Value
22.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · TCU
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Ed Wesley, ?. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · TCU. Ed Wesley shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
TCU paired 11 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Wyoming
Win with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
10
Primary Metric / G
0.6
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
44.4
Best Game by takeover score
Louisiana Tech
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Louisiana Tech: 1. Baylor: 0. SMU: 0. San Diego State: 0. New Mexico: 1. BYU: 0. Wyoming: 2. Boise State: 0. Colorado State: 1. UNLV: 1
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
Wyoming
Best efficiency game
— vs Louisiana Tech
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/22 | @ Louisiana Tech | W 31-24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 16 | 77 | 4.80 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 12/3 | vs UNLV | W 56-9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 8 | 34 | 4.30 | 1 | 9 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Colorado State | W 34-10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 9 | 63 | 7 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Boise State | W 36-35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 9 | 24 | 2.70 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Wyoming | W 31-20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 19 | 120 | 6.30 | 2 | 20 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs BYU | W 38-28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 12 | 59 | 4.90 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs New Mexico | W 69-0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6 | 74 | 12.30 | 1 | 48 |
| Sun 10/9 | @ San Diego State | W 27-14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 24 | 146 | 6.10 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs SMU | L 33-40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 11 | 93 | 8.50 | 0 | 63 |
| Sat 9/3 | @ Baylor | L 48-50 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6 | 36 | 6 | 0 | 24 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
TCU
2009-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Postseason | TCU | 7 | — | — | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | TCU | 7 | — | — | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | TCU | 11 | — | — | 4 |
| 2010 Regular Season | TCU | 11 | — | — | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | TCU | 6 | — | — | -5 |
| 2011 Regular Season | TCU | 6 | — | — | 0 |
#1 Featured game
UNLV
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2
Primary metric
2 primary-metric impact.
#2
Air Force
2
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#3
Colorado State
2
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#4
Baylor
2
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#5
Wyoming
2
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#1 Season by value score
2010 Postseason · TCU
11 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
28.9
#2
2010 Regular Season · TCU
28.9
11 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2011 Postseason · TCU
22.5
6 primary · — efficiency · — usage
5
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
24
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Ed Wesley quick answers