Usage Score
18.8
Player Dossier
2008-2011Houston
Patrick Edwards
WR • 5'9" • Hearne, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Patrick Edwards reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
88
Consistency
62.7
Season Value
67.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Houston
080909101111
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Houston
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Rice
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Patrick Edwards, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Houston. Patrick Edwards reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason
Houston paired 1,752 primary output with 88 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 88 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Rice
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2011 Postseason · Houston
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
125.1
Efficiency
88
Usage
18.8
Consistency
62.7
Best Game by takeover score
Penn State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Penn State: 228. UCLA: 21. North Texas: 187. Louisiana Tech: 81. Unknown: 76. UTEP: 144. East Carolina: 133. Marshall: 109. Rice: 318. UAB: 79. Tulane: 129. SMU: 38. Tulsa: 181. Southern Miss: 28
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Penn State: 10 by 100. UCLA: 2 by 70. North Texas: 8 by 100. Louisiana Tech: 3 by 100. Unknown: 4 by 100. UTEP: 8 by 100. East Carolina: 12 by 73.9. Marshall: 7 by 100. Rice: 7 by 100. UAB: 5 by 100. Tulane: 5 by 100. SMU: 5 by 50.7. Tulsa: 8 by 100. Southern Miss: 5 by 37.3
Split Comparison
Wins137.3 · n=12
First Half124.3 · n=7 · -1.7 vs Second Half
Second Half126 · n=7 · +1.7 vs First Half
All Games125.1 · n=14
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Rice
Best efficiency game
100 vs Penn State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 1/2 | @ Penn State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 30-14 | — | 10 | 228 | 22.8 | 22.80 | 2 | 75 |
| Sat 12/3 | vs Southern Miss | L 28-49 | — | 5 | 28 | 3.2 | 5.60 | 0 | 13 |
| Fri 11/25 | @ Tulsa100 receiving yards · High volume | W 48-16 | — | 8 | 181 | 22.6 | 22.60 | 4 | 51 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs SMU | W 37-7 | — | 5 | 38 | 7.6 | 7.60 | 0 | 15 |
| Fri 11/11 | @ Tulane100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 73-17 | — | 5 | 129 | 25.8 | 25.80 | 3 | 66 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ UAB | W 56-13 | — | 5 | 79 | 15.8 | 15.80 | 0 | 25 |
| Fri 10/28 | vs Rice100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 73-34 | — | 7 | 318 | 45.4 | 45.40 | 5 | 64 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Marshall100 receiving yards | W 63-28 | — | 7 | 109 | 15.6 | 15.60 | 1 | 70 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs East Carolina100 receiving yards · High volume | W 56-3 | — | 12 | 133 | 11.4 | 11.10 | 2 | 27 |
| Fri 9/30 | @ UTEP100 receiving yards · High volume | W 49-42 | — | 8 | 144 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 48 |
| Sun 9/25 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 76 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 30 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Louisiana Tech2+ TD | W 35-34 | — | 3 | 81 | 27 | 27 | 2 | 50 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ North Texas100 receiving yards · High volume | W 48-23 | — | 8 | 187 | 23.4 | 23.40 | 1 | 58 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs UCLA | W 38-34 | — | 2 | 21 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 16 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Houston
2008-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
200820092009201020112011
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Houston | 634 | 83.6 | 17.7 | — |
| 2009 Postseason | Houston | 1,021 | 78.2 | 16.7 | 387 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Houston | 1,021 | 78.2 | 16.7 | 0 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Houston | 1,100 | 80.3 | 24 | 79 |
| 2011 Postseason | Houston | 1,752 | 88 | 18.8 | 652 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Houston | 1,752 | 88 | 18.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Rice
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
169
Primary metric
169 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Texas Tech
177
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
177 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Rice
318
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
318 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
UCF
162
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
162 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Tulsa
176
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
176 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2011 Postseason · Houston
1,752 primary output · 88 efficiency · 18.8 usage
67.4
#2
2011 Regular Season · Houston
67.4
1,752 primary · 88 efficiency · 18.8 usage
#3
2010 Regular Season · Houston
60.1
1,100 primary · 80.3 efficiency · 24 usage
Milestones
18
100+ receiving yards
13
8+ catch outings
10
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
4,507
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 48 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.