Usage / Role
25%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2008-2011UCLA
WR • 6'3" • Overland Park, KS, USA
Taylor Embree reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage / Role
25%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
41
Developing production for a receiver
Reliability
51
Useful contributor with volatile peaks
Star Power
44
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2009 Postseason · UCLA
Snapshot
Player Story
Taylor Embree built his college career from 2008 through 2011 as a wide receiver from Overland Park, KS wearing No. 82, spending time with UCLA. The clearest part of Taylor Embree's career was his receiving role: 137...
Read the storyTaylor Embree, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2009 Postseason · UCLA. Taylor Embree reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | UCLA | 11 | 40 | 531 | 0 | 75.7 |
| 2009 Postseason | UCLA | 12 | 2 | 28 | 0 | 77.8 |
| 2009 Regular Season | UCLA | 12 | 43 | 580 | 2 | 77.8 |
| 2010 Regular Season | UCLA | 11 | 32 | 409 | 0 | 64.6 |
| 2011 Postseason | UCLA | 11 | 1 | 16 | 1 | 51.6 |
| 2011 Regular Season | UCLA | 11 | 19 | 212 | 1 | 51.6 |
Related Context
Taylor Embree played WR for UCLA. Across 4 tracked seasons, Taylor Embree recorded 1 rushing yards, 1,776 receiving yards, and 4 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2009 with UCLA.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
UCLA paired 608 primary output with 84.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2008 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 81.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: California
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
48.3
Efficiency
81.9
Usage
17.9
Consistency
74
Best Game by takeover score
California
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Tennessee: 53. BYU: 18. Arizona: 12. Fresno State: 48. Washington State: 63. Oregon: 58. Stanford: 72. California: 90. Oregon State: 64. Arizona State: 43. USC: 10
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Tennessee: 4 by 88.3. BYU: 1 by 100. Arizona: 2 by 40. Fresno State: 3 by 100. Washington State: 5 by 84. Oregon: 6 by 64.4. Stanford: 4 by 100. California: 5 by 100. Oregon State: 5 by 85.3. Arizona State: 4 by 71.7. USC: 1 by 66.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
California
Best efficiency game
100 vs California
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/6 | vs USC | L 7-28 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 11/29 | @ Arizona State | L 9-34 | — | 4 | 43 | 10.8 | 10.80 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 11/8 | vs Oregon State | L 6-34 | — | 5 | 64 | 12.8 | 12.80 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ California | L 20-41 | — | 5 | 90 | 15.2 | 18 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Stanford | W 23-20 | — | 4 | 72 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 43 |
| Sun 10/12 | @ Oregon | L 24-31 | — | 6 | 58 | 9.7 | 9.70 | 0 | 17 |
| Sun 10/5 | vs Washington State | W 28-3 | — | 5 | 63 | 12.6 | 12.60 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Fresno State | L 31-36 | — | 3 | 48 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Arizona | L 10-31 | — | 2 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ BYU | L 0-59 | — | 1 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 18 |
| Tue 9/2 | vs Tennessee | W 27-24 | — | 4 | 53 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 0 | 21 |
Player Story
Taylor Embree built his college career from 2008 through 2011 as a wide receiver from Overland Park, KS wearing No. 82, spending time with UCLA. The clearest part of Taylor Embree's career was his receiving role: 137 catches, 1,776 receiving yards, 4 touchdowns, and 1 rushing yard across 45 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2009 with UCLA. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
The value of the career arc is that it connects production to role, not just a name on a roster. His career also includes 1 rushing yard and 161 return yards, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. With 45 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across UCLA.
The arc is straightforward: Taylor Embree moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UCLA
2008-2011
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | UCLA | 531 | 81.9 | 17.9 | — |
| 2009 Postseason | UCLA | 608 | 84.1 | 18.9 | 77 |
| 2009 Regular Season | UCLA | 608 | 84.1 | 18.9 | 0 |
| 2010 Regular Season | UCLA | 409 | 83.7 | 17.8 | -199 |
| 2011 Postseason | UCLA | 228 | 74.9 | 12.6 | -181 |
| 2011 Regular Season | UCLA | 228 | 74.9 | 12.6 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
vs San Diego State
Week 1 · W 33-14
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
97
Receiving Yards
100 takeover
97 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
@ California
Week 9 · L 20-41 · Conference game
90
Receiving Yards
95.9 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
90 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
vs California
Week 7 · L 26-45 · Conference game
89
Receiving Yards
90.4 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
89 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
@ Arizona State
Week 13 · L 34-55 · Conference game
105
Receiving Yards
89.6 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
105 receiving yards with a 77.8 efficiency score.
#5
@ Oregon State
Week 9 · L 19-26 · Conference game
88
Receiving Yards
88.8 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
88 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2009 Postseason · UCLA
608 primary output · 84.1 efficiency · 18.9 usage
77.8
#2
2009 Regular Season · UCLA
77.8
608 primary · 84.1 efficiency · 18.9 usage
#3
2008 Regular Season · UCLA
75.7
531 primary · 81.9 efficiency · 17.9 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.