Usage Score
12.6
Player Dossier
2008-2011UCLA
WR • 6'3" • Overland Park, KS, USA
Taylor Embree reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
12.6
Efficiency
74.9
Consistency
52.1
Season Value
44.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · UCLA
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Taylor Embree, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · UCLA. Taylor Embree reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
UCLA paired 608 primary output with 84.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 74.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Houston
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
20.7
Efficiency
74.9
Usage
12.6
Consistency
52.1
Best Game by takeover score
Illinois
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Illinois: 16. Houston: 60. San José State: 23. Oregon State: 22. Stanford: 8. Washington State: 8. Arizona State: 16. Utah: 15. Colorado: 13. USC: 29. Oregon: 18
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Illinois: 1 by 100. Houston: 5 by 80. San José State: 2 by 76.7. Oregon State: 1 by 100. Stanford: 1 by 53.3. Washington State: 1 by 53.3. Arizona State: 2 by 53.3. Utah: 1 by 100. Colorado: 2 by 43.3. USC: 3 by 64.4. Oregon: 1 by 100
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Houston
Best efficiency game
100 vs Illinois
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/31 | vs Illinois | L 14-20 | — | 1 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 12/3 | @ Oregon | L 31-49 | — | 1 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 18 |
| Sun 11/27 | @ USC | L 0-50 | — | 3 | 29 | 9.7 | 9.70 | 0 | 15 |
| Sun 11/20 | vs Colorado | W 45-6 | — | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Utah | L 6-31 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Arizona State | W 29-28 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sun 10/9 | vs Washington State | W 28-25 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sun 10/2 | @ Stanford | L 19-45 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Oregon State | W 27-19 | — | 1 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 1 | 22 |
| Sun 9/11 | vs San José State | W 27-17 | — | 2 | 23 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/3 | @ Houston | L 34-38 | — | 5 | 60 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 25 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UCLA
2008-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | UCLA | 531 | 81.9 | 17.9 | — |
| 2009 Postseason | UCLA | 608 | 84.1 | 18.9 | 77 |
| 2009 Regular Season | UCLA | 608 | 84.1 | 18.9 | 0 |
| 2010 Regular Season | UCLA | 409 | 83.7 | 17.8 | -199 |
| 2011 Postseason | UCLA | 228 | 74.9 | 12.6 | -181 |
| 2011 Regular Season | UCLA | 228 | 74.9 | 12.6 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
San Diego State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
97
Primary metric
97 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
California
90
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
90 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
California
89
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
89 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Oregon State
88
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
88 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Arizona State
105
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
105 receiving yards with a 77.8 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2009 Postseason · UCLA
608 primary output · 84.1 efficiency · 18.9 usage
66.8
#2
2009 Regular Season · UCLA
66.8
608 primary · 84.1 efficiency · 18.9 usage
#3
2008 Regular Season · UCLA
66.2
531 primary · 81.9 efficiency · 17.9 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,776
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 45 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Taylor Embree quick answers