Usage Score
17.8
Player Dossier
2008-2011Cincinnati
D.J. Woods
WR • 6'0" • Strongsville, OH, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
D.J. Woods reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
77.4
Consistency
56.5
Season Value
49.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Cincinnati
080809091011
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Cincinnati
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Oklahoma
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
D.J. Woods, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Cincinnati. D.J. Woods reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season
Cincinnati paired 898 primary output with 81 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 77.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2011 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tennessee
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2011 Regular Season · Cincinnati
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
37
Efficiency
77.4
Usage
17.8
Consistency
56.5
Best Game by takeover score
UConn
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 59. Tennessee: 111. Akron: 62. NC State: 22. Miami (OH): 0. Louisville: 30. South Florida: 39. Pittsburgh: 41. West Virginia: 27. Rutgers: 5. Syracuse: 36. UConn: 12
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 4 by 98.3. Tennessee: 9 by 82.2. Akron: 2 by 100. NC State: 6 by 24.4. Louisville: 2 by 100. South Florida: 6 by 43.3. Pittsburgh: 2 by 100. West Virginia: 2 by 90. Rutgers: 1 by 33.3. Syracuse: 2 by 100. UConn: 1 by 80
Split Comparison
Wins30.3 · n=8 · -17.4 vs Losses
Losses47.7 · n=3 · +17.4 vs Wins
First Half47.3 · n=6 · +20.7 vs Second Half
Second Half26.7 · n=6 · -20.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tennessee
Best efficiency game
100 vs Syracuse
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/3 | vs UConn | W 35-27 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 11/26 | @ Syracuse | W 30-13 | — | 2 | 36 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 11/19 | @ Rutgers | L 3-20 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs West Virginia | L 21-24 | — | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Pittsburgh | W 26-23 | — | 2 | 41 | 16 | 20.50 | 0 | 44 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ South Florida | W 37-34 | — | 6 | 39 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Louisville | W 25-16 | — | 2 | 30 | 10.7 | 15 | 1 | 26 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Miami (OH) | W 27-0 | — | — | — | 3 | — | — | — |
| Fri 9/23 | vs NC State | W 44-14 | — | 6 | 22 | 3.7 | 3.70 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Akron | W 59-14 | — | 2 | 62 | 31 | 31 | 0 | 50 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Tennessee100 receiving yards · High volume | L 23-45 | — | 9 | 111 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 0 | 46 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 59 | 16.6 | 14.80 | 1 | 34 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Cincinnati
2008-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
200820082009200920102011
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Postseason | Cincinnati | 168 | 69.6 | 7.4 | — |
| 2008 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 168 | 69.6 | 7.4 | 0 |
| 2009 Postseason | Cincinnati | 640 | 80.7 | 17.4 | 472 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 640 | 80.7 | 17.4 | 0 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 898 | 81 | 23.4 | 258 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 444 | 77.4 | 17.8 | -454 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Oklahoma
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
171
Primary metric
171 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Tennessee
111
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
111 receiving yards with a 82.2 efficiency score.
#3
Oregon State
117
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
117 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Rutgers
67
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
67 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
NC State
146
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
146 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2010 Regular Season · Cincinnati
898 primary output · 81 efficiency · 23.4 usage
62.1
#2
2009 Postseason · Cincinnati
58.9
640 primary · 80.7 efficiency · 17.4 usage
#3
2009 Regular Season · Cincinnati
58.9
640 primary · 80.7 efficiency · 17.4 usage
Milestones
5
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
2,150
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 48 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.