Usage Score
14.7
Player Profile
Brendon Kay
QB • 6'4" • Marine City, MI, USA
Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator
Brendon Kay is a balanced quarterback profile with 14.7 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
63.4
Consistency
76
Season Value
63.5
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Cincinnati
09101112121313
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Primary stop by seasons
- Cincinnati
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Cincinnati
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Duke
Brendon Kay, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Cincinnati. Brendon Kay is a balanced quarterback profile with 14.7 usage in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
Cincinnati paired 3,439 primary output with 63.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 63.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Houston
Win shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Postseason · Cincinnati
Games
13
Primary Metric / G
264.5
Efficiency
63.4
Usage
14.7
Consistency
76
Best Game by takeover score
North Carolina
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. North Carolina: 166. Purdue: 61. Illinois: 74. Unknown: 284. Miami (OH): 201. South Florida: 268. Temple: 288. UConn: 302. Memphis: 321. SMU: 291. Rutgers: 412. Houston: 444. Louisville: 327
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. North Carolina: 43 by 43.6. Purdue: 6 by 74.6. Illinois: 14 by 54.6. Unknown: 17 by 82.9. Miami (OH): 44 by 55.5. South Florida: 47 by 56.4. Temple: 43 by 68.6. UConn: 26 by 70.2. Memphis: 40 by 60.5. SMU: 38 by 59.3. Rutgers: 39 by 80.5. Houston: 59 by 63. Louisville: 51 by 54.8
Split Comparison
Wins290 · n=8 · +81.3 vs Losses
Losses208.8 · n=4 · -81.3 vs Wins
First Half191.7 · n=7 · -157.8 vs Second Half
Second Half349.5 · n=6 · +157.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Houston
Best efficiency game
82.9 vs Unknown
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/28 | @ North Carolina | L 17-39 | 15 | 35 | 181 | 42.9 | 0 | 1 | 43.6 | 8 | -15 | -1.90 | 0 | 17 |
| Fri 12/6 | vs Louisville300-yard game | L 24-31 | 22 | 40 | 304 | 55.0 | 0 | 2 | 54.8 | 11 | 23 | 2.10 | 2 | 8 |
| Sat 11/23 | @ Houston300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 24-17 | 29 | 50 | 406 | 58.0 | 2 | 2 | 63 | 9 | 38 | 4.20 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 11/16 | @ Rutgers300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 52-17 | 24 | 38 | 405 | 63.2 | 4 | 0 | 80.5 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 11/9 | vs SMU | W 28-25 | 27 | 32 | 299 | 84.4 | 2 | 2 | 59.3 | 6 | -8 | -1.30 | 0 | 4 |
| Thu 10/31 | @ Memphis300-yard game | W 34-21 | 27 | 35 | 321 | 77.1 | 1 | 1 | 60.5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs UConn300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 41-16 | 17 | 24 | 300 | 70.8 | 4 | 0 | 70.2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Temple3+ TD | W 38-20 | 31 | 37 | 270 | 83.8 | 2 | 0 | 68.6 | 6 | 18 | 3 | 1 | 11 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ South Florida3+ TD | L 20-26 | 24 | 36 | 240 | 66.7 | 3 | 2 | 56.4 | 11 | 28 | 2.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Miami (OH) | W 14-0 | 23 | 37 | 171 | 62.2 | 0 | 2 | 55.5 | 7 | 30 | 4.30 | 1 | 9 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Unknown3+ TD | — | 13 | 15 | 275 | 86.7 | 4 | 0 | 82.9 | 2 | 9 | 4.50 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Illinois | L 17-45 | 6 | 11 | 71 | 54.5 | 0 | 0 | 54.6 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Purdue | W 42-7 | 4 | 5 | 59 | 80.0 | 0 | 0 | 74.6 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Cincinnati
2009-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
2009201020112012201220132013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 51 | 82.5 | 5 | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 34 | 61.9 | 6.9 | -17 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 22 | 73.3 | 6.1 | -12 |
| 2012 Postseason | Cincinnati | 1,604 | 72.3 | 16.2 | 1,582 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 1,604 | 72.3 | 16.2 | 0 |
| 2013 Postseason | Cincinnati | 3,439 | 63.4 | 14.7 | 1,835 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 3,439 | 63.4 | 14.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Duke
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
408
Primary metric
408 total offense with 86 efficiency.
#2
Unknown
41
Primary metric
Game with 41 yards of offense and 93.3 efficiency.
41 total offense with 93.3 efficiency.
#3
Houston
444
Primary metric
Win shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
444 total offense with 63 efficiency.
#4
Temple
315
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
315 total offense with 89.7 efficiency.
#5
Unknown
22
Primary metric
Game with 22 yards of offense and 73.3 efficiency.
22 total offense with 73.3 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Postseason · Cincinnati
3,439 primary output · 63.4 efficiency · 14.7 usage
63.5
#2
2013 Regular Season · Cincinnati
63.5
3,439 primary · 63.4 efficiency · 14.7 usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · Cincinnati
45
22 primary · 73.3 efficiency · 6.1 usage
Milestones
12
250+ passing yards
7
300+ total offense
1
3+ takeover TD games
18
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
5,150
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 28 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.