Usage Score
31.5
Player Profile
Kendall Hinton
WR • 6'0" • 195 lbs • Durham, NC, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Kendall Hinton reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
81
Consistency
65.5
Season Value
63.3
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Wake Forest
15161718181919
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Primary stop by seasons
- Wake Forest
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Wake Forest
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Duke
Kendall Hinton, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Wake Forest. Kendall Hinton reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Wake Forest paired 1,001 primary output with 81 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 81 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Duke
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Wake Forest
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
91
Efficiency
81
Usage
31.5
Consistency
65.5
Best Game by takeover score
Michigan State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Michigan State: 48. Utah State: 66. Rice: 44. Boston College: 67. Louisville: 134. Florida State: 93. NC State: 93. Virginia Tech: 162. Clemson: 17. Duke: 189. Syracuse: 88
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Michigan State: 3 by 100. Utah State: 9 by 48.9. Rice: 2 by 100. Boston College: 6 by 74.4. Louisville: 13 by 68.7. Florida State: 7 by 88.6. NC State: 6 by 100. Virginia Tech: 8 by 100. Clemson: 2 by 56.7. Duke: 6 by 100. Syracuse: 11 by 53.3
Split Comparison
Wins92 · n=6 · +2.2 vs Losses
Losses89.8 · n=5 · -2.2 vs Wins
First Half75.3 · n=6 · -34.5 vs Second Half
Second Half109.8 · n=5 · +34.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Duke
Best efficiency game
100 vs Michigan State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/27 | vs Michigan State | L 21-27 | — | 3 | 48 | 16 | 16 | 1 | 29 |
| Sat 11/30 | @ SyracuseHigh volume | L 30-39 | — | 11 | 88 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 18 |
| Sun 11/24 | vs Duke100 receiving yards | W 39-27 | — | 6 | 189 | 27.9 | 31.50 | 1 | 62 |
| Sat 11/16 | @ Clemson | L 3-52 | — | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 11/9 | @ Virginia Tech100 receiving yards · High volume | L 17-36 | — | 8 | 162 | 20.3 | 20.30 | 0 | 45 |
| Sat 11/2 | vs NC State | W 44-10 | — | 6 | 93 | 13.4 | 15.50 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Florida State | W 22-20 | — | 7 | 93 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 0 | 36 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Louisville100 receiving yards · High volume | L 59-62 | — | 13 | 134 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Boston College | W 27-24 | — | 6 | 67 | 11.2 | 11.20 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Rice | W 41-21 | — | 2 | 44 | 22 | 22 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Utah StateHigh volume | W 38-35 | — | 9 | 66 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 1 | 18 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Wake Forest
2015-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
2015201620172018201820192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 0 | — | 0.4 | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 0 | — | 0.2 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 0 | — | 0.2 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Wake Forest | 61 | 67.8 | 16.2 | 61 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 61 | 67.8 | 16.2 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Wake Forest | 1,001 | 81 | 31.5 | 940 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 1,001 | 81 | 31.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Duke
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
189
Primary metric
189 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Virginia Tech
162
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
162 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Memphis
38
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
38 receiving yards with a 84.4 efficiency score.
#4
Louisville
134
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
134 receiving yards with a 68.7 efficiency score.
#5
NC State
93
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
93 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Postseason · Wake Forest
1,001 primary output · 81 efficiency · 31.5 usage
63.3
#2
2019 Regular Season · Wake Forest
63.3
1,001 primary · 81 efficiency · 31.5 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · Wake Forest
50.2
0 primary · — efficiency · 0.4 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,062
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 33 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.