Usage Score
11.1
Player Dossier
2012-2019Michigan
Brian Cole II
S • 6'2" • 210 lbs • Saginaw, MI, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Brian Cole II shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 33.7 disruption score.
Efficiency
33.7
Consistency
40.7
Season Value
26
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Michigan
121314151819
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Michigan • Mississippi State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Southern Miss
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Brian Cole II, S. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Michigan. Brian Cole II shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 33.7 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
Michigan paired 0 primary output with 0 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 33.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Michigan, Mississippi State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Southern Miss
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Regular Season · Mississippi State
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
1.0
Efficiency
33.7
Usage
11.1
Consistency
40.7
Best Game by takeover score
Ole Miss
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Louisiana: 1. Southern Miss: 3.5. Kansas State: 3. Kentucky: 1. Auburn: 0. Tennessee: 2. LSU: 0.5. Texas A&M: 0. Arkansas: 1. Alabama: 0. Unknown: 0.5. Ole Miss: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Louisiana: 3 by 22.5. Southern Miss: 7 by 64.2. Kansas State: 6 by 55. Kentucky: 5 by 30.8. Auburn: 4 by 16.7. Tennessee: 5 by 40.8. LSU: 7 by 34.2. Texas A&M: 9 by 37.5. Arkansas: 3 by 22.5. Alabama: 6 by 25. Unknown: 7 by 34.2. Ole Miss: 5 by 20.8
Split Comparison
Wins1.3 · n=5 · +0.4 vs Losses
Losses0.9 · n=6 · -0.4 vs Wins
First Half1.8 · n=6 · +1.4 vs Second Half
Second Half0.3 · n=6 · -1.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Southern Miss
Best efficiency game
64.2 vs Southern Miss
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/29 | vs Ole Miss | W 21-20 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/24 | vs Unknown | — | 7 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Alabama | L 7-38 | 6 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Arkansas | W 54-24 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Texas A&M | L 30-49 | 9 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | vs LSU | L 13-36 | 7 | 5 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | @ TennesseeSplash game | L 10-20 | 5 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Auburn | L 23-56 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Kentucky | W 28-13 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Kansas StateSplash game | L 24-31 | 6 | 4 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Southern MissSplash game | W 38-15 | 7 | 5 | — | 2.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/31 | @ Louisiana | W 38-28 | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Michigan
2012-2015
Opening stop
- 2
Mississippi State
2018-2019
Final stop
Season Progression
201220132014201520182019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 5 | 19.2 | 5.1 | 5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 12.5 | 33.7 | 11.1 | 7.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Southern Miss
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5
Primary metric
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 64.9 takeover score.
#2
Kansas State
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 56.7 takeover score.
#3
Kansas State
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 44.5 takeover score.
#4
Kentucky
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 44.2 takeover score.
#5
Tennessee
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 39.4 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · Michigan
0 primary output · 0 efficiency · — usage
50
#2
2019 Regular Season · Mississippi State
26
12.5 primary · 33.7 efficiency · 11.1 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · Mississippi State
22.1
5 primary · 19.2 efficiency · 5.1 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
4
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2015 · Rating 0.9638
Heritage · Saginaw, MI
- Committed To
- Michigan
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2015
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
78
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 18 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.