Usage Score
20.5
Player Dossier
2012-2018SMU
Ryheem Malone
WR • 5'9" • 187 lbs • Houston, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Ryheem Malone reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
71.7
Consistency
58.6
Season Value
55.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Louisiana
1213141516171818
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- SMU • Louisiana
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Ryheem Malone, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Louisiana. Ryheem Malone reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
Louisiana paired 676 primary output with 88.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 71.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across SMU, Louisiana.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UL Monroe
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Postseason · Louisiana
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
37.5
Efficiency
71.7
Usage
20.5
Consistency
58.6
Best Game by takeover score
Tulane
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Tulane: 59. Unknown: 46. Mississippi State: 69. Coastal Carolina: 7. Alabama: 20. Texas State: 23. New Mexico State: 52. App State: 47. Arkansas State: 20. Troy: 13. Georgia State: 54. South Alabama: 17. UL Monroe: 91. App State: 7
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Tulane: 3 by 100. Unknown: 4 by 76.7. Mississippi State: 7 by 65.7. Coastal Carolina: 2 by 23.3. Alabama: 4 by 33.3. Texas State: 4 by 38.3. New Mexico State: 3 by 100. App State: 3 by 100. Arkansas State: 1 by 100. Troy: 2 by 43.3. Georgia State: 2 by 100. South Alabama: 1 by 100. UL Monroe: 6 by 100. App State: 2 by 23.3
Split Comparison
Wins42.8 · n=6 · +11.1 vs Losses
Losses31.7 · n=7 · -11.1 vs Wins
First Half39.4 · n=7 · +3.9 vs Second Half
Second Half35.6 · n=7 · -3.9 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UL Monroe
Best efficiency game
100 vs Tulane
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/15 | vs Tulane | L 24-41 | — | 3 | 59 | 19.7 | 19.70 | 0 | 47 |
| Sat 12/1 | @ App State | L 19-30 | — | 2 | 7 | 1.3 | 3.50 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 11/24 | @ UL Monroe | W 31-28 | — | 6 | 91 | 12.8 | 15.20 | 1 | 40 |
| Sat 11/17 | vs South Alabama | W 48-38 | — | 1 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 11/10 | vs Georgia State | W 36-22 | — | 2 | 54 | 27 | 27 | 1 | 32 |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Troy | L 16-26 | — | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/27 | vs Arkansas State | W 47-43 | — | 1 | 20 | 7.3 | 20 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 10/20 | @ App State | L 17-27 | — | 3 | 47 | 15.7 | 15.70 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs New Mexico State | W 66-38 | — | 3 | 52 | 17.3 | 17.30 | 1 | 31 |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Texas State | W 42-27 | — | 4 | 23 | 5.8 | 5.80 | 1 | 6 |
| Sat 9/29 | @ Alabama | L 14-56 | — | 4 | 20 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Coastal Carolina | L 28-30 | — | 2 | 7 | 3.5 | 3.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/15 | @ Mississippi State | L 10-56 | — | 7 | 69 | 9 | 9.90 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 46 | 10.8 | 11.50 | 0 | 19 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
SMU
2012-2015
Opening stop
- 2
Louisiana
2016-2018
Final stop
Season Progression
20122013201420152016201720182018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | SMU | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | SMU | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | SMU | 37 | 50.8 | 7 | 37 |
| 2015 Regular Season | SMU | 258 | 59.4 | 13.1 | 221 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Louisiana | 0 | — | — | -258 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Louisiana | 676 | 88.3 | 24.1 | 676 |
| 2018 Postseason | Louisiana | 525 | 71.7 | 20.5 | -151 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Louisiana | 525 | 71.7 | 20.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Tulsa
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
119
Primary metric
119 receiving yards with a 99.2 efficiency score.
#2
UL Monroe
91
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
91 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
New Mexico State
113
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
113 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Georgia Southern
106
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
106 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
TCU
90
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
90 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Regular Season · Louisiana
676 primary output · 88.3 efficiency · 24.1 usage
66.9
#2
2018 Postseason · Louisiana
55.5
525 primary · 71.7 efficiency · 20.5 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · Louisiana
55.5
525 primary · 71.7 efficiency · 20.5 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
2
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
1,496
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 41 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.