Usage Score
30.6
Player Profile
Ahmad Bradshaw
QB • 5'11" • 205 lbs • Chicago, IL, USA
Dual-threat creatorVolume operator
Ahmad Bradshaw is a dual-threat creator with 30.6 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
60.8
Consistency
74.3
Season Value
66.4
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Army
141516161717
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Primary stop by seasons
- Army
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Army
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Air Force
Ahmad Bradshaw, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Army. Ahmad Bradshaw is a dual-threat creator with 30.6 usage in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Army paired 2,031 primary output with 60.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 60.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Air Force
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 92.3th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Postseason · Army
Games
13
Primary Metric / G
156.2
Efficiency
60.8
Usage
30.6
Consistency
74.3
Best Game by takeover score
San Diego State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. San Diego State: 186. Unknown: 177. Buffalo: 164. Ohio State: 69. Tulane: 65. UTEP: 173. Rice: 115. Eastern Michigan: 171. Temple: 123. Air Force: 265. Duke: 138. North Texas: 271. Navy: 114
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. San Diego State: 35 by 51.6. Unknown: 11 by 50. Buffalo: 33 by 50.4. Ohio State: 26 by 44.4. Tulane: 13 by 16.3. UTEP: 16 by 86.1. Rice: 15 by 22.1. Eastern Michigan: 22 by 47.5. Temple: 18 by 74.4. Air Force: 23 by 100. Duke: 21 by 87. North Texas: 30 by 74.7. Navy: 22 by 86.2
Split Comparison
Wins161 · n=9 · +26 vs Losses
Losses135 · n=3 · -26 vs Wins
First Half135.6 · n=7 · -44.8 vs Second Half
Second Half180.3 · n=6 · +44.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Air Force
Best efficiency game
100 vs Air Force
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/23 | vs San Diego StateDual-threat | W 42-35 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 33.3 | 0 | 0 | 51.6 | 32 | 180 | 5.60 | 2 | 27 |
| Sat 12/9 | @ NavyDual-threat | W 14-13 | 1 | 1 | 20 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 86.2 | 21 | 94 | 4.50 | 1 | 21 |
| Sat 11/18 | @ North TexasDual-threat | L 49-52 | 1 | 3 | 27 | 33.3 | 0 | 0 | 74.7 | 27 | 244 | 9 | 2 | 31 |
| Sat 11/11 | vs DukeDual-threat | W 21-16 | 1 | 1 | 42 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 87 | 20 | 96 | 4.80 | 1 | 18 |
| Sat 11/4 | @ Air ForceDual-threat | W 21-0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 100 | 23 | 265 | 11.50 | 1 | 48 |
| Sat 10/21 | vs Temple | W 31-28 | 3 | 5 | 74 | 60.0 | 0 | 0 | 74.4 | 13 | 49 | 3.80 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/14 | vs Eastern MichiganDual-threat | W 28-27 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 47.5 | 19 | 171 | 9 | 1 | 69 |
| Sat 10/7 | @ RiceDual-threat | W 49-12 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 | 22.1 | 13 | 115 | 8.80 | 2 | 29 |
| Sat 9/30 | vs UTEPDual-threat | W 35-21 | 3 | 5 | 80 | 60.0 | 1 | 0 | 86.1 | 11 | 93 | 8.50 | 0 | 42 |
| Sat 9/23 | @ TulaneDual-threat | L 17-21 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 | 16.3 | 10 | 65 | 6.50 | 1 | 23 |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Ohio StateDual-threat | L 7-38 | 2 | 7 | 19 | 28.6 | 0 | 0 | 44.4 | 19 | 50 | 2.60 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/9 | vs BuffaloDual-threat | W 21-17 | 2 | 8 | 17 | 25.0 | 0 | 0 | 50.4 | 25 | 147 | 5.90 | 1 | 52 |
| Fri 9/1 | vs UnknownDual-threat | — | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 9 | 177 | 19.70 | 2 | 71 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Army
2014-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
201420152016201620172017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Army | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Army | 897 | 62.8 | 34.8 | 897 |
| 2016 Postseason | Army | 1,481 | 61 | 24.8 | 584 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Army | 1,481 | 61 | 24.8 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Army | 2,031 | 60.8 | 30.6 | 550 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Army | 2,031 | 60.8 | 30.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Air Force
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
265
Primary metric
265 total offense with 100 efficiency.
#2
North Texas
271
Primary metric
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
271 total offense with 74.7 efficiency.
#3
Unknown
250
Primary metric
Game with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
250 total offense with 62.4 efficiency.
#4
Wake Forest
210
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
210 total offense with 62.3 efficiency.
#5
North Texas
182
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
182 total offense with 84.6 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Postseason · Army
2,031 primary output · 60.8 efficiency · 30.6 usage
66.4
#2
2017 Regular Season · Army
66.4
2,031 primary · 60.8 efficiency · 30.6 usage
#3
2016 Postseason · Army
60
1,481 primary · 61 efficiency · 24.8 usage
Milestones
3
250+ passing yards
0
300+ total offense
3
3+ takeover TD games
17
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
4,409
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 32 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.