Usage Score
4.1
Player Dossier
2014-2018Ole Miss
Ken Webster
DB • 5'11" • 194 lbs • Decatur, GA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Ken Webster shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 22.7 disruption score.
Efficiency
22.7
Consistency
53.3
Season Value
26.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Ole Miss
1415161718
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Ole Miss
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Texas A&M
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Ken Webster, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Ole Miss. Ken Webster shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 22.7 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season
Ole Miss paired 0 primary output with 0 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 22.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2018 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Vanderbilt
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Regular Season · Ole Miss
Games
10
Havoc Plays / G
0.9
Efficiency
22.7
Usage
4.1
Consistency
53.3
Best Game by takeover score
Mississippi State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas Tech: 0. Unknown: 1. LSU: 0. UL Monroe: 1. Arkansas: 0. Auburn: 2. South Carolina: 1. Texas A&M: 1. Vanderbilt: 3. Mississippi State: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas Tech: 2 by 8.3. Unknown: 3 by 22.5. LSU: 2 by 8.3. UL Monroe: 2 by 18.3. Arkansas: 6 by 25. Auburn: 3 by 32.5. South Carolina: 2 by 18.3. Texas A&M: 3 by 22.5. Vanderbilt: 4 by 46.7. Mississippi State: 6 by 25
Split Comparison
Wins0.3 · n=3 · -0.8 vs Losses
Losses1.2 · n=6 · +0.8 vs Wins
First Half0.4 · n=5 · -1.0 vs Second Half
Second Half1.4 · n=5 · +1.0 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Vanderbilt
Best efficiency game
46.7 vs Vanderbilt
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/23 | vs Mississippi State | L 3-35 | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/18 | @ Vanderbilt | L 29-36 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 11/10 | @ Texas A&M | L 24-38 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/3 | vs South Carolina | L 44-48 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/20 | vs Auburn | L 16-31 | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/13 | @ Arkansas | W 37-33 | 6 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/6 | vs UL Monroe | W 70-21 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 9/30 | @ LSU | L 16-45 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/1 | @ Texas Tech | W 47-27 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Ole Miss
2014-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
20142015201620172018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 0 | 0 | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 1 | 20 | — | 1 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 0 | — | — | -1 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 3.5 | 19.5 | 3.2 | 3.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 9 | 22.7 | 4.1 | 5.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Texas A&M
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1
Primary metric
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#2
Vanderbilt
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 51.9 takeover score.
#3
California
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 48.3 takeover score.
#4
Auburn
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 36.1 takeover score.
#5
LSU
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 26.4 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2014 Regular Season · Ole Miss
0 primary output · 0 efficiency · — usage
50
#2
2015 Regular Season · Ole Miss
41
1 primary · 20 efficiency · — usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · Ole Miss
26.7
9 primary · 22.7 efficiency · 4.1 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2022 · Rating 0.8926
Buford · Buford, GA
- Committed To
- Alabama
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2022
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
62
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 20 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.