Usage / Role
68%
Regular offensive contributor
Player Dossier
2014-2016Texas State
RB • 5'10" • Cedar Park, TX, USA
Stedman Mayberry leans workhorse runner traits and 42.5 efficiency.
Usage / Role
68%
Regular offensive contributor
Impact Production
66
Solid production for a back
Reliability
63
Reliable weekly contributor
Star Power
69
Useful peak profile
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2016 Regular Season · Texas State
Snapshot
Player Story
Stedman Mayberry built his college career from 2014 through 2016 as a running back from Cedar Park, TX wearing No. 26, spending time with Texas State. The clearest part of Stedman Mayberry's career was his backfield...
Read the storyStedman Mayberry, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2016 Regular Season · Texas State. Stedman Mayberry leans workhorse runner traits and 42.5 efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Texas State | 1 | 62 | 54 | 8 | 0 | 51 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Texas State | 3 | 87 | 61 | 26 | 0 | 27.1 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Texas State | 12 | 914 | 593 | 321 | 5 | 72.5 |
Related Context
Stedman Mayberry played RB for Texas State. Across 3 tracked seasons, Stedman Mayberry recorded 708 rushing yards, 355 receiving yards, and 1 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Texas State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Texas State paired 914 primary output with 42.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 42.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2016 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UL Monroe
Loss with 116 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 83.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Scrimmage Yards / G
76.2
Efficiency
42.5
Usage
28.9
Consistency
65.3
Best Game by takeover score
UL Monroe
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ohio: 126. Arkansas: 47. Houston: 30. Incarnate Word: 98. Georgia State: 148. UL Monroe: 116. Louisiana: 76. App State: 51. Idaho: 107. New Mexico State: 62. Troy: 35. Arkansas State: 18
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio: 23 by 51.9. Arkansas: 13 by 36.3. Houston: 8 by 39.4. Incarnate Word: 25 by 35.9. Georgia State: 31 by 40.8. UL Monroe: 14 by 84. Louisiana: 22 by 34.2. App State: 15 by 29.8. Idaho: 15 by 49.9. New Mexico State: 14 by 47.8. Troy: 10 by 36.1. Arkansas State: 8 by 23.4
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
UL Monroe
Best efficiency game
84 vs UL Monroe
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/4 | vs Arkansas State | L 14-36 | 8 | 18 | 2.30 | 0 | — | — | 2.3 |
| Sat 11/26 | vs Troy | L 7-40 | 9 | 31 | 3.40 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3.5 |
| Sat 11/19 | @ New Mexico State | L 10-50 | 13 | 61 | 4.70 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4.4 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Idaho | L 14-47 | 9 | 29 | 3.20 | 1 | 6 | 78 | 7.1 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ App State | L 10-35 | 10 | 25 | 2.50 | 1 | 5 | 26 | 3.4 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Louisiana | L 3-27 | 17 | 54 | 3.20 | 0 | 5 | 22 | 3.5 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ UL Monroe | L 34-40 | 11 | 87 | 7.90 | 1 | 3 | 29 | 8.3 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Georgia State | L 21-41 | 26 | 87 | 3.30 | 0 | 5 | 61 | 4.8 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Incarnate Word | W 48-17 | 22 | 69 | 3.10 | 0 | 3 | 29 | 3.9 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Houston | L 3-64 | 5 | 19 | 3.80 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 3.8 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Arkansas | L 3-42 | 10 | 34 | 3.40 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 3.6 |
| Sat 9/3 | @ Ohio | W 56-54 | 17 | 79 | 4.60 | 1 | 6 | 47 | 5.5 |
Player Story
Stedman Mayberry built his college career from 2014 through 2016 as a running back from Cedar Park, TX wearing No. 26, spending time with Texas State. The clearest part of Stedman Mayberry's career was his backfield work: 708 rushing yards, 183 carries, 5 rushing touchdowns, and 355 receiving yards across 16 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2016 with Texas State. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
The value of the career arc is that it connects production to role, not just a name on a roster. His career also includes 355 receiving yards and 1 tackle, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. With 16 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across Texas State.
The arc is straightforward: Stedman Mayberry moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Texas State
2014-2016
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Texas State | 62 | 48 | 17.3 | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Texas State | 87 | 35.6 | 9.8 | 25 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Texas State | 914 | 42.5 | 28.9 | 827 |
#1 Featured game
@ UL Monroe
Week 7 · L 34-40 · Conference game
Loss with 116 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
116
Scrimmage Yards
83.8 takeover
116 scrimmage yards and 31.1 usage.
#2
@ Georgia State
Week 6 · L 21-41 · Conference game
148
Scrimmage Yards
80.3 takeover
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load.
148 scrimmage yards and 45.6 usage.
#3
vs Idaho
Week 11 · L 14-47 · Conference game
107
Scrimmage Yards
74 takeover
Loss with 107 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
107 scrimmage yards and 34.9 usage.
#4
@ Ohio
Week 1 · W 56-54
126
Scrimmage Yards
72 takeover
Win with 126 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
126 scrimmage yards and 27.7 usage.
#5
vs Prairie View A&M
Week 2 · W 63-24
66
Scrimmage Yards
67 takeover
Win with 66 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
66 scrimmage yards and 17.6 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2016 Regular Season · Texas State
914 primary output · 42.5 efficiency · 28.9 usage
72.5
#2
2014 Regular Season · Texas State
51
62 primary · 48 efficiency · 17.3 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · Texas State
27.1
87 primary · 35.6 efficiency · 9.8 usage
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.