Usage Score
20.9
Player Dossier
2014-2017UCF
Tre'Quan Smith
WR • 6'1" • 205 lbs • Delray Beach, FL, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Tre'Quan Smith reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
90.3
Consistency
67.5
Season Value
69.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · UCF
141516161717
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- UCF
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: South Florida
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tre'Quan Smith, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · UCF. Tre'Quan Smith reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
UCF paired 1,171 primary output with 90.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 90.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Cincinnati
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Postseason · UCF
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
90.1
Efficiency
90.3
Usage
20.9
Consistency
67.5
Best Game by takeover score
Auburn
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Auburn: 89. Florida International: 72. Maryland: 29. Memphis: 71. Cincinnati: 165. East Carolina: 93. Navy: 6. Unknown: 64. SMU: 141. UConn: 120. Temple: 89. South Florida: 71. Memphis: 161
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Auburn: 5 by 100. Florida International: 3 by 100. Maryland: 4 by 48.3. Memphis: 3 by 100. Cincinnati: 5 by 100. East Carolina: 5 by 100. Navy: 1 by 40. Unknown: 5 by 85.3. SMU: 7 by 100. UConn: 7 by 100. Temple: 4 by 100. South Florida: 4 by 100. Memphis: 6 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins92.3 · n=12
First Half75 · n=7 · -32.7 vs Second Half
Second Half107.7 · n=6 · +32.7 vs First Half
All Games90.1 · n=13
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Cincinnati
Best efficiency game
100 vs Auburn
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 1/1 | @ Auburn | W 34-27 | — | 5 | 89 | 17.8 | 17.80 | 0 | 34 |
| Sat 12/2 | vs Memphis100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 62-55 | — | 6 | 161 | 26.8 | 26.80 | 2 | 50 |
| Fri 11/24 | vs South Florida | W 49-42 | — | 4 | 71 | 17.8 | 17.80 | 0 | 30 |
| Sat 11/18 | @ Temple | W 45-19 | — | 4 | 89 | 22.3 | 22.30 | 1 | 41 |
| Sat 11/11 | vs UConn100 receiving yards | W 49-24 | — | 7 | 120 | 16.9 | 17.10 | 1 | 41 |
| Sat 11/4 | @ SMU100 receiving yards | W 31-24 | — | 7 | 141 | 20.1 | 20.10 | 0 | 63 |
| Sat 10/28 | vs Unknown | — | — | 5 | 64 | 12.8 | 12.80 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 10/21 | @ Navy | W 31-21 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 6 |
| Sat 10/14 | vs East Carolina | W 63-21 | — | 5 | 93 | 18.6 | 18.60 | 0 | 37 |
| Sun 10/8 | @ Cincinnati100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 51-23 | — | 5 | 165 | 28.3 | 33 | 3 | 79 |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Memphis2+ TD | W 40-13 | — | 3 | 71 | 23.7 | 23.70 | 2 | 34 |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Maryland | W 38-10 | — | 4 | 29 | 4.6 | 7.30 | 0 | 13 |
| Thu 8/31 | vs Florida International2+ TD | W 61-17 | — | 3 | 72 | 24 | 24 | 2 | 50 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UCF
2014-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
201420152016201620172017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | UCF | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | UCF | 724 | 84.2 | 28.5 | 724 |
| 2016 Postseason | UCF | 853 | 82.2 | 24.1 | 129 |
| 2016 Regular Season | UCF | 853 | 82.2 | 24.1 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | UCF | 1,171 | 90.3 | 20.9 | 318 |
| 2017 Regular Season | UCF | 1,171 | 90.3 | 20.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
South Florida
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
102
Primary metric
102 receiving yards with a 97.1 efficiency score.
#2
Cincinnati
165
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
165 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Tulsa
131
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
131 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
South Florida
183
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
183 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Memphis
161
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
161 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Postseason · UCF
1,171 primary output · 90.3 efficiency · 20.9 usage
69.7
#2
2017 Regular Season · UCF
69.7
1,171 primary · 90.3 efficiency · 20.9 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · UCF
59.6
724 primary · 84.2 efficiency · 28.5 usage
Milestones
11
100+ receiving yards
3
8+ catch outings
5
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
2,748
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 37 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.