Usage Score
11
Player Dossier
2015-2018Colorado
Drew Lewis
ILB • 6'2" • 225 lbs • Sammamish, WA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Drew Lewis shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 30.4 disruption score.
Efficiency
40.6
Consistency
13.9
Season Value
18.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Colorado
15161718
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Colorado
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UCLA
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Drew Lewis, ILB. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Colorado. Drew Lewis shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 30.4 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
Colorado paired 12.5 primary output with 30.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 40.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: California
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Regular Season · Colorado
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
0.8
Efficiency
40.6
Usage
11
Consistency
13.9
Best Game by takeover score
Utah
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Colorado State: 1. Texas State: 0. Unknown: 0. Washington: 1. UCLA: 1.5. Arizona: 0. Oregon State: 0. Washington State: 0. California: 4. Arizona State: 0. USC: 0. Utah: 2
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Colorado State: 6 by 35. Texas State: 10 by 41.7. Unknown: 9 by 37.5. Washington: 10 by 51.7. UCLA: 7 by 44.2. Arizona: 3 by 12.5. Oregon State: 10 by 41.7. Washington State: 7 by 29.2. California: 5 by 60.8. Arizona State: 9 by 37.5. USC: 7 by 29.2. Utah: 11 by 65.8
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins1.3 · Games = 4 · +0.6 vs Losses
Losses0.6 · Games = 7 · -0.6 vs Wins
First Half0.6 · Games = 6 · -0.4 vs Second Half
Second Half1 · Games = 6 · +0.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
California
Best efficiency game
65.8 vs Utah
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/26 | @ Utah10+ tackles | L 13-34 | 11 | 6 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/11 | vs USC | L 24-38 | 7 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/5 | @ Arizona State | L 30-41 | 9 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | vs California | W 44-28 | 5 | 4 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sun 10/22 | @ Washington State | L 0-28 | 7 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Oregon State10+ tackles | W 36-33 | 10 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/8 | vs Arizona | L 42-45 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/1 | @ UCLA | L 23-27 | 7 | 6 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/24 | vs Washington10+ tackles | L 10-37 | 10 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Unknown | — | 9 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Texas State10+ tackles | W 37-3 | 10 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Colorado State | W 17-3 | 6 | 5 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Colorado
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
2015201620172018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Colorado | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Colorado | 3 | 12.1 | 3.5 | 3 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Colorado | 9.5 | 40.6 | 11 | 6.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Colorado | 12.5 | 30.4 | 7.8 | 3 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UCLA
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
6
Primary metric
6 disruption/tackle impact with 71.9 takeover score.
#2
California
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 58.4 takeover score.
#3
Oregon State
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 50.8 takeover score.
#4
Utah
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 44 takeover score.
#5
Washington
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 36.8 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Regular Season · Colorado
12.5 primary output · 30.4 efficiency · 7.8 usage
23
#2
2017 Regular Season · Colorado
18.9
9.5 primary · 40.6 efficiency · 11 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Colorado
7.1
3 primary · 12.1 efficiency · 3.5 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
1
Splash games
5
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2022 · Rating 0.8652
Independence · Frisco, TX
- Committed To
- Baylor
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2022
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
167
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 31 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.