Usage Score
9.5
Player Dossier
2012-2018Washington State
Peyton Bender
QB • 6'1" • 205 lbs • Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA
Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator
Peyton Bender is a balanced quarterback profile with 9.5 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
51.5
Consistency
81
Season Value
60.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Kansas
121314151718
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Washington State • Kansas
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Washington
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Peyton Bender, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Kansas. Peyton Bender is a balanced quarterback profile with 9.5 usage in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
Kansas paired 1,759 primary output with 51.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 51.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2018 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Washington State, Kansas.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: TCU
Win with 247 yards of offense and 59.3 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Regular Season · Kansas
Games
11
Primary Metric / G
159.9
Efficiency
51.5
Usage
9.5
Consistency
81
Best Game by takeover score
Texas
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 172. Central Michigan: 119. Rutgers: 73. Baylor: 93. West Virginia: 170. Texas Tech: 191. TCU: 247. Iowa State: 178. Kansas State: 201. Oklahoma: 167. Texas: 148
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 45 by 49.7. Central Michigan: 27 by 51.8. Rutgers: 13 by 54.3. Baylor: 19 by 52.6. West Virginia: 29 by 52.9. Texas Tech: 44 by 44.8. TCU: 33 by 59.3. Iowa State: 42 by 46. Kansas State: 37 by 54.7. Oklahoma: 29 by 55.5. Texas: 38 by 44.5
Split Comparison
Wins146.3 · n=3 · -17.7 vs Losses
Losses164 · n=7 · +17.7 vs Wins
First Half136.3 · n=6 · -51.9 vs Second Half
Second Half188.2 · n=5 · +51.9 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
TCU
Best efficiency game
59.3 vs TCU
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/23 | vs Texas | L 17-24 | 18 | 35 | 159 | 51.4 | 1 | 1 | 44.5 | 3 | -11 | -3.70 | 0 | 0 |
| Sun 11/18 | @ Oklahoma | L 40-55 | 19 | 27 | 167 | 70.4 | 0 | 0 | 55.5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 11/10 | @ Kansas State | L 17-21 | 21 | 34 | 232 | 61.8 | 2 | 0 | 54.7 | 3 | -31 | -10.30 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Iowa State | L 3-27 | 19 | 41 | 185 | 46.3 | 0 | 0 | 46 | 1 | -7 | -7 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 10/27 | vs TCU | W 27-26 | 19 | 29 | 249 | 65.5 | 2 | 0 | 59.3 | 4 | -2 | -0.50 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Texas Tech | L 16-48 | 18 | 41 | 221 | 43.9 | 2 | 1 | 44.8 | 3 | -30 | -10 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 10/6 | @ West Virginia | L 22-38 | 16 | 25 | 191 | 64.0 | 2 | 1 | 52.9 | 4 | -21 | -5.30 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 9/22 | @ Baylor | L 7-26 | 10 | 17 | 105 | 58.8 | 1 | 0 | 52.6 | 2 | -12 | -6 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Rutgers | W 55-14 | 8 | 12 | 73 | 66.7 | 0 | 0 | 54.3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 9/8 | @ Central Michigan | W 31-7 | 17 | 26 | 130 | 65.4 | 1 | 0 | 51.8 | 1 | -11 | -11 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Unknown | — | 19 | 35 | 187 | 54.3 | 2 | 0 | 49.7 | 10 | -15 | -1.50 | 0 | 15 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Washington State
2012-2015
Opening stop
- 2
Kansas
2017-2018
Final stop
Season Progression
201220132014201520172018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Washington State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Washington State | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Washington State | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Washington State | 480 | 52.6 | 25 | 480 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Kansas | 1,522 | 47.8 | 9.9 | 1,042 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Kansas | 1,759 | 51.5 | 9.5 | 237 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Washington
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
270
Primary metric
270 total offense with 47.4 efficiency.
#2
TCU
247
Primary metric
Win with 247 yards of offense and 59.3 efficiency.
247 total offense with 59.3 efficiency.
#3
Colorado
133
Primary metric
Win with 133 yards of offense and 63.8 efficiency.
133 total offense with 63.8 efficiency.
#4
Unknown
353
Primary metric
Game shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
353 total offense with 55.6 efficiency.
#5
Ohio
313
Primary metric
Loss with 313 yards of offense and 54 efficiency.
313 total offense with 54 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Regular Season · Kansas
1,759 primary output · 51.5 efficiency · 9.5 usage
60.3
#2
2017 Regular Season · Kansas
50.3
1,522 primary · 47.8 efficiency · 9.9 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · Washington State
34.4
480 primary · 52.6 efficiency · 25 usage
Milestones
4
250+ passing yards
3
300+ total offense
0
3+ takeover TD games
3
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
3,761
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 26 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.