Usage / Role
25%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2014-2018Tulsa
WR • 6'4" • 230 lbs • Overland Park, KS, USA
Justin Hobbs reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage / Role
25%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
70
High-end production for a receiver
Reliability
85
Regular contributor with several takeover games
Star Power
65
Useful peak profile
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2017 Regular Season · Tulsa
Snapshot
Player Story
Justin Hobbs built his college career from 2014 through 2018 as a wide receiver from Overland Park, KS wearing No. 29, spending time with Tulsa. The clearest part of Justin Hobbs' career was his receiving role: 176...
Read the storyJustin Hobbs, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2017 Regular Season · Tulsa. Justin Hobbs reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Tulsa | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2015 Postseason | Tulsa | 11 | 3 | 35 | 0 | 63 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Tulsa | 11 | 29 | 516 | 2 | 63 |
| 2016 Postseason | Tulsa | 13 | 3 | 28 | 0 | 65.7 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Tulsa | 13 | 47 | 657 | 4 | 65.7 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Tulsa | 11 | 55 | 830 | 3 | 88.7 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Tulsa | 11 | 39 | 480 | 3 | 69.8 |
Related Context
Justin Hobbs played WR for Tulsa. Across 5 tracked seasons, Justin Hobbs recorded 13 rushing yards, 2,546 receiving yards, and 3 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2017 with Tulsa.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
Tulsa paired 830 primary output with 85.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 85.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2018 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: SMU
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
75.5
Efficiency
85.7
Usage
38
Consistency
69
Best Game by takeover score
SMU
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma State: 71. Louisiana: 103. Toledo: 68. New Mexico: 93. Navy: 55. Tulane: 59. UConn: 96. SMU: 141. Memphis: 57. South Florida: 41. Temple: 46
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma State: 6 by 78.9. Louisiana: 5 by 100. Toledo: 5 by 90.7. New Mexico: 7 by 88.6. Navy: 4 by 91.7. Tulane: 2 by 100. UConn: 9 by 71.1. SMU: 3 by 100. Memphis: 5 by 76. South Florida: 6 by 45.6. Temple: 3 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
SMU
Best efficiency game
100 vs Temple
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/25 | vs Temple | L 22-43 | — | 3 | 46 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 1 | 35 |
| Fri 11/17 | @ South Florida | L 20-27 | — | 6 | 41 | 6.8 | 6.80 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 11/4 | vs Memphis | L 14-41 | — | 5 | 57 | 11.4 | 11.40 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 10/28 | @ SMU100 receiving yards | L 34-38 | — | 3 | 141 | 47 | 47 | 0 | 60 |
| Sat 10/21 | @ UConnHigh volume | L 14-20 | — | 9 | 96 | 10.7 | 10.70 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 10/7 | @ Tulane | L 28-62 | — | 2 | 59 | 29.5 | 29.50 | 1 | 59 |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Navy | L 21-31 | — | 4 | 55 | 13.8 | 13.80 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 9/23 | vs New Mexico | L 13-16 | — | 7 | 93 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 0 | 34 |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Toledo | L 51-54 | — | 5 | 68 | 13.6 | 13.60 | 0 | 39 |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Louisiana100 receiving yards | W 66-42 | — | 5 | 103 | 20.6 | 20.60 | 1 | 69 |
| Thu 8/31 | @ Oklahoma State | L 24-59 | — | 6 | 71 | 11.8 | 11.80 | 0 | 24 |
Player Story
Justin Hobbs built his college career from 2014 through 2018 as a wide receiver from Overland Park, KS wearing No. 29, spending time with Tulsa. The clearest part of Justin Hobbs' career was his receiving role: 176 catches, 2,546 receiving yards, 12 touchdowns, and 13 rushing yards across 46 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2017 with Tulsa. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
The value of the career arc is that it connects production to role, not just a name on a roster. His career also includes 13 rushing yards and 3 tackles, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. With 46 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across Tulsa.
The arc is straightforward: Justin Hobbs moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Tulsa
2014-2018
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Tulsa | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Postseason | Tulsa | 551 | 92.9 | 13.2 | 551 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Tulsa | 551 | 92.9 | 13.2 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Tulsa | 685 | 76.3 | 19.3 | 134 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Tulsa | 685 | 76.3 | 19.3 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Tulsa | 830 | 85.7 | 38 | 145 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Tulsa | 480 | 74.4 | 24.3 | -350 |
#1 Featured game
@ SMU
Week 9 · W 40-31 · Conference game
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
150
Receiving Yards
100 takeover
150 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
@ SMU
Week 9 · L 34-38 · Conference game
141
Receiving Yards
100 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
141 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
@ Houston
Week 6 · L 26-41 · Conference game
82
Receiving Yards
100 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
82 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
@ Houston
Week 7 · L 31-38 · Conference game
129
Receiving Yards
99.6 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
129 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
@ Navy
Week 11 · L 40-42 · Conference game
123
Receiving Yards
98.4 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
123 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2017 Regular Season · Tulsa
830 primary output · 85.7 efficiency · 38 usage
88.7
#2
2018 Regular Season · Tulsa
69.8
480 primary · 74.4 efficiency · 24.3 usage
#3
2016 Postseason · Tulsa
65.7
685 primary · 76.3 efficiency · 19.3 usage
6
100+ receiving yards
3
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.