Usage Score
34.5
Player Dossier
2014-2018Tulane
Terren Encalade
WR • 6'0" • 190 lbs • East Pointe a la Hache, LA, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Terren Encalade reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
70.1
Consistency
42.6
Season Value
51.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Tulane
141516171818
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Tulane
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Massachusetts
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Terren Encalade, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Tulane. Terren Encalade reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
Tulane paired 730 primary output with 87.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 70.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Massachusetts
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Regular Season · Tulane
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
41.7
Efficiency
70.1
Usage
34.5
Consistency
42.6
Best Game by takeover score
UConn
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Wake Forest: 19. Unknown: 5. Navy: 0. Louisiana: 103. Massachusetts: 125. Memphis: 47. Tulsa: 3. SMU: 75. UCF: 20. Houston: 41. Temple: 5. UConn: 57
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wake Forest: 4 by 31.7. Unknown: 1 by 33.3. Louisiana: 7 by 98.1. Massachusetts: 7 by 100. Memphis: 3 by 100. Tulsa: 1 by 20. SMU: 4 by 100. UCF: 1 by 100. Houston: 5 by 54.7. Temple: 1 by 33.3. UConn: 2 by 100
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins95 · Games = 3 · +68.8 vs Losses
Losses26.3 · Games = 8 · -68.8 vs Wins
First Half49.8 · Games = 6 · +16.3 vs Second Half
Second Half33.5 · Games = 6 · -16.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Massachusetts
Best efficiency game
100 vs UConn
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/26 | @ UConn | W 38-13 | — | 2 | 57 | 28.5 | 28.50 | 0 | 37 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Temple | L 0-31 | — | 1 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Houston | L 18-30 | — | 5 | 41 | 8.2 | 8.20 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ UCF | L 6-37 | — | 1 | 20 | 14.3 | 20 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs SMU2+ TD | L 31-35 | — | 4 | 75 | 18.8 | 18.80 | 2 | 24 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Tulsa | L 27-50 | — | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Memphis | L 14-24 | — | 3 | 47 | 15.7 | 15.70 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Massachusetts100 receiving yards | W 31-24 | — | 7 | 125 | 17.9 | 17.90 | 1 | 38 |
| Sun 9/25 | vs Louisiana100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 41-39 | — | 7 | 103 | 14.7 | 14.70 | 3 | 34 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Navy | L 14-21 | — | — | — | 11.5 | — | — | — |
| Sun 9/11 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Thu 9/1 | @ Wake Forest | L 3-7 | — | 4 | 19 | 4.8 | 4.80 | 0 | 8 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Tulane
2014-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
201420152016201720182018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Tulane | 235 | 77.1 | 13.2 | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Tulane | 43 | 71.7 | 16.7 | -192 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Tulane | 500 | 70.1 | 34.5 | 457 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Tulane | 730 | 87.5 | 29.8 | 230 |
| 2018 Postseason | Tulane | 727 | 84.1 | 29.3 | -3 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Tulane | 727 | 84.1 | 29.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Massachusetts
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
125
Primary metric
125 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Houston
186
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
186 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Wake Forest
189
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
189 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Louisiana
103
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
103 receiving yards with a 98.1 efficiency score.
#5
East Carolina
59
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
59 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Regular Season · Tulane
730 primary output · 87.5 efficiency · 29.8 usage
63.7
#2
2018 Postseason · Tulane
61.1
727 primary · 84.1 efficiency · 29.3 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · Tulane
61.1
727 primary · 84.1 efficiency · 29.3 usage
Milestones
5
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2014 · Rating 0.7719
Belle Chasse · Belle Chasse, LA
- Committed To
- Tulane
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2014
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
2,235
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 45 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.