Usage Score
14.2
Player Dossier
2014-2017Memphis
Phil Mayhue
WR • 6'3" • 210 lbs • Sicklerville, NJ, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Phil Mayhue reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
88.8
Consistency
73.1
Season Value
62.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Memphis
1414151516161717
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Memphis
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Tulane
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Phil Mayhue, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Memphis. Phil Mayhue reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Memphis paired 670 primary output with 83.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 88.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Iowa State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Postseason · Memphis
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
47.4
Efficiency
88.8
Usage
14.2
Consistency
73.1
Best Game by takeover score
Iowa State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Iowa State: 85. UL Monroe: 19. UCLA: 23. Unknown: 57. UCF: 24. UConn: 41. Navy: 30. Houston: 63. Tulane: 56. Tulsa: 74. East Carolina: 49
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Iowa State: 5 by 100. UL Monroe: 1 by 100. UCLA: 2 by 76.7. Unknown: 4 by 95. UCF: 3 by 53.3. UConn: 4 by 68.3. Navy: 2 by 100. Houston: 5 by 84. Tulane: 3 by 100. Tulsa: 4 by 100. East Carolina: 2 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins44.4 · n=8 · -10.1 vs Losses
Losses54.5 · n=2 · +10.1 vs Wins
First Half41.5 · n=6 · -12.9 vs Second Half
Second Half54.4 · n=5 · +12.9 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Iowa State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Iowa State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/30 | vs Iowa State | L 20-21 | — | 5 | 85 | 17 | 17 | 1 | 36 |
| Sat 11/25 | vs East Carolina | W 70-13 | — | 2 | 49 | 24.5 | 24.50 | 1 | 46 |
| Sat 11/4 | @ Tulsa | W 41-14 | — | 4 | 74 | 18.5 | 18.50 | 0 | 38 |
| Sat 10/28 | vs Tulane | W 56-26 | — | 3 | 56 | 18.7 | 18.70 | 0 | 30 |
| Fri 10/20 | @ Houston | W 42-38 | — | 5 | 63 | 12.6 | 12.60 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/14 | vs Navy | W 30-27 | — | 2 | 30 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 20 |
| Fri 10/6 | @ UConn | W 70-31 | — | 4 | 41 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/30 | @ UCF | L 13-40 | — | 3 | 24 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 17 |
| Sun 9/24 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 57 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 9/16 | vs UCLA | W 48-45 | — | 2 | 23 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 1 | 20 |
| Fri 9/1 | vs UL Monroe | W 37-29 | — | 1 | 19 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 19 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Memphis
2014-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
20142014201520152016201620172017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Postseason | Memphis | 242 | 77.5 | 10.3 | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Memphis | 242 | 77.5 | 10.3 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Memphis | 670 | 83.6 | 16.7 | 428 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Memphis | 670 | 83.6 | 16.7 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Memphis | 677 | 91.3 | 15.9 | 7 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Memphis | 677 | 91.3 | 15.9 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Memphis | 521 | 88.8 | 14.2 | -156 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Memphis | 521 | 88.8 | 14.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Tulane
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
107
Primary metric
107 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Iowa State
85
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
85 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Houston
142
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
142 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
SMU
96
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
96 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Tulsa
74
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
74 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · Memphis
670 primary output · 83.6 efficiency · 16.7 usage
67.7
#2
2015 Regular Season · Memphis
67.7
670 primary · 83.6 efficiency · 16.7 usage
#3
2016 Postseason · Memphis
65.5
677 primary · 91.3 efficiency · 15.9 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
2,110
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 43 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.