Usage Score
14.7
Player Dossier
2014-2018Toledo
Jon'Vea Johnson
WR • 6'0" • 188 lbs • Gary, IN, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Jon'Vea Johnson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
93.6
Consistency
67.6
Season Value
65.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Toledo
1415161617171818
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Toledo
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Fresno State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jon'Vea Johnson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Toledo. Jon'Vea Johnson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Toledo paired 660 primary output with 93.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 93.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Fresno State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Postseason · Toledo
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
50.8
Efficiency
93.6
Usage
14.7
Consistency
67.6
Best Game by takeover score
Florida International
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Florida International: 49. Unknown: 80. Miami: 18. Nevada: 38. Fresno State: 112. Bowling Green: 37. Eastern Michigan: 47. Buffalo: 19. Western Michigan: 56. Ball State: 8. Northern Illinois: 54. Kent State: 55. Central Michigan: 87
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida International: 3 by 100. Unknown: 3 by 100. Miami: 1 by 100. Nevada: 1 by 100. Fresno State: 6 by 100. Bowling Green: 2 by 100. Eastern Michigan: 3 by 100. Buffalo: 1 by 100. Western Michigan: 2 by 100. Ball State: 2 by 26.7. Northern Illinois: 4 by 90. Kent State: 1 by 100. Central Michigan: 3 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins46.8 · n=6 · -3 vs Losses
Losses49.8 · n=6 · +3 vs Wins
First Half54.4 · n=7 · +7.9 vs Second Half
Second Half46.5 · n=6 · -7.9 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Fresno State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Florida International
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/21 | vs Florida International2+ TD | L 32-35 | — | 3 | 49 | 16.3 | 16.30 | 2 | 43 |
| Fri 11/23 | vs Central Michigan | W 51-13 | — | 3 | 87 | 29 | 29 | 1 | 44 |
| Thu 11/15 | @ Kent State | W 56-34 | — | 1 | 55 | 55 | 55 | 1 | 55 |
| Thu 11/8 | @ Northern Illinois | L 15-38 | — | 4 | 54 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 1 | 23 |
| Wed 10/31 | vs Ball State | W 45-13 | — | 2 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 8 |
| Thu 10/25 | @ Western Michigan | W 51-24 | — | 2 | 56 | 28 | 28 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 10/20 | vs Buffalo | L 17-31 | — | 1 | 19 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/13 | @ Eastern Michigan | L 26-28 | — | 3 | 47 | 15.7 | 15.70 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Bowling Green | W 52-36 | — | 2 | 37 | 18.5 | 18.50 | 0 | 29 |
| Sun 9/30 | @ Fresno State100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | L 27-49 | — | 6 | 112 | 18.7 | 18.70 | 2 | 54 |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Nevada | W 63-44 | — | 1 | 38 | 38 | 38 | 1 | 38 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Miami | L 24-49 | — | 1 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 80 | 26.7 | 26.70 | 1 | 57 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Toledo
2014-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
20142015201620162017201720182018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Toledo | 1 | 6.7 | 3.6 | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Toledo | 101 | 81.3 | 7.8 | 100 |
| 2016 Postseason | Toledo | 773 | 86.9 | 13.3 | 672 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Toledo | 773 | 86.9 | 13.3 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Toledo | 689 | 87.8 | 16.4 | -84 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Toledo | 689 | 87.8 | 16.4 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Toledo | 660 | 93.6 | 14.7 | -29 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Toledo | 660 | 93.6 | 14.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Fresno State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
112
Primary metric
112 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
BYU
182
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
182 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Akron
102
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
102 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Akron
103
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
103 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Western Michigan
96
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
96 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Toledo
660 primary output · 93.6 efficiency · 14.7 usage
65.6
#2
2018 Regular Season · Toledo
65.6
660 primary · 93.6 efficiency · 14.7 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · Toledo
64.3
689 primary · 87.8 efficiency · 16.4 usage
Milestones
6
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
5
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2014 · Rating 0.8353
West Side · Gary, IN
- Committed To
- Toledo
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2014
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
2,224
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 45 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.