Usage Score
25.2
Player Dossier
2014-2018Eastern Michigan
Blake Banham
WR • 5'9" • 195 lbs • St. Paul, MN, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Blake Banham reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
72.2
Consistency
46.7
Season Value
61
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Eastern Michigan
14151616171818
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Eastern Michigan
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Buffalo
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Blake Banham, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Eastern Michigan. Blake Banham reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Eastern Michigan paired 758 primary output with 72.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 72.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Buffalo
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Postseason · Eastern Michigan
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
58.3
Efficiency
72.2
Usage
25.2
Consistency
46.7
Best Game by takeover score
Georgia Southern
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Georgia Southern: 44. Unknown: 103. Purdue: 99. Buffalo: 159. San Diego State: 0. Northern Illinois: 26. Western Michigan: 57. Toledo: 21. Ball State: 14. Army: 104. Central Michigan: 99. Akron: 27. Kent State: 5
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Georgia Southern: 6 by 48.9. Unknown: 8 by 85.8. Purdue: 6 by 100. Buffalo: 9 by 100. Northern Illinois: 3 by 57.8. Western Michigan: 5 by 76. Toledo: 4 by 35. Ball State: 2 by 46.7. Army: 7 by 99. Central Michigan: 7 by 94.3. Akron: 2 by 90. Kent State: 1 by 33.3
Split Comparison
Wins44.2 · n=6 · -20.8 vs Losses
Losses65 · n=6 · +20.8 vs Wins
First Half69.7 · n=7 · +24.7 vs Second Half
Second Half45 · n=6 · -24.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Buffalo
Best efficiency game
100 vs Buffalo
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/15 | vs Georgia Southern | L 21-23 | — | 6 | 44 | 7 | 7.30 | 0 | 14 |
| Fri 11/23 | @ Kent State | W 28-20 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 11/10 | vs Akron | W 27-7 | — | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Central Michigan | W 17-7 | — | 7 | 99 | 13 | 14.10 | 1 | 47 |
| Sat 10/27 | vs Army100 receiving yards | L 22-37 | — | 7 | 104 | 13.1 | 14.90 | 1 | 58 |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Ball State | W 42-20 | — | 2 | 14 | 5.7 | 7 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Toledo | W 28-26 | — | 4 | 21 | 4 | 5.30 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Western Michigan | L 24-27 | — | 5 | 57 | 11.4 | 11.40 | 1 | 27 |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Northern Illinois | L 23-26 | — | 3 | 26 | 8.4 | 8.70 | 0 | 13 |
| Sun 9/23 | @ San Diego State | L 20-23 | — | — | — | 3 | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/15 | @ Buffalo100 receiving yards · High volume | L 28-35 | — | 9 | 159 | 17.7 | 17.70 | 1 | 75 |
| Sat 9/8 | @ Purdue | W 20-19 | — | 6 | 99 | 16.5 | 16.50 | 0 | 29 |
| Fri 8/31 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards · High volume | — | — | 8 | 103 | 12.9 | 12.90 | 1 | 30 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Eastern Michigan
2014-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
2014201520162016201720182018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Eastern Michigan | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Eastern Michigan | 28 | 30 | 9.5 | 28 |
| 2016 Postseason | Eastern Michigan | 71 | 65.4 | 13.5 | 43 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Eastern Michigan | 71 | 65.4 | 13.5 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Eastern Michigan | 94 | 40.6 | 8.5 | 23 |
| 2018 Postseason | Eastern Michigan | 758 | 72.2 | 25.2 | 664 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Eastern Michigan | 758 | 72.2 | 25.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Buffalo
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
159
Primary metric
159 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Miami (OH)
45
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
45 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Army
104
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
104 receiving yards with a 99 efficiency score.
#4
Toledo
25
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
25 receiving yards with a 83.3 efficiency score.
#5
Central Michigan
53
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
53 receiving yards with a 70.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Eastern Michigan
758 primary output · 72.2 efficiency · 25.2 usage
61
#2
2018 Regular Season · Eastern Michigan
61
758 primary · 72.2 efficiency · 25.2 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Eastern Michigan
28.1
94 primary · 40.6 efficiency · 8.5 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
951
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 40 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.