Usage Score
6.7
Player Dossier
2014-2014Bowling Green
Cody Callaway
QB • 6'1" • Grafton, OH, USA
Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator
Cody Callaway is a balanced quarterback profile with 6.7 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
45.2
Consistency
31.7
Season Value
44.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · Bowling Green
1414
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 2
- Program Path
- Bowling Green
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Toledo
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Cody Callaway, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · Bowling Green. Cody Callaway is a balanced quarterback profile with 6.7 usage in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason
Bowling Green paired 127 primary output with 45.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 45.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Toledo
Loss with 81 yards of offense and 50 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2014 Postseason · Bowling Green
Games
5
Primary Metric / G
25.4
Efficiency
45.2
Usage
6.7
Consistency
31.7
Best Game by takeover score
South Alabama
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. South Alabama: -6. Unknown: 28. Wisconsin: 14. Toledo: 81. Northern Illinois: 10
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. South Alabama: 2 by 52.1. Unknown: 5 by 70.1. Wisconsin: 7 by 41.3. Toledo: 18 by 50. Northern Illinois: 6 by 12.5
Split Comparison
Losses35 · n=3
First Half12 · n=3 · -33.5 vs Second Half
Second Half45.5 · n=2 · +33.5 vs First Half
All Games25.4 · n=5
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
5 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Toledo
Best efficiency game
70.1 vs Unknown
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Bowling Green
2014
Opening stop
Season Progression
20142014
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Postseason | Bowling Green | 127 | 45.2 | 6.7 | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 127 | 45.2 | 6.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Toledo
Loss with 81 yards of offense and 50 efficiency.
81
Primary metric
81 total offense with 50 efficiency.
#2
Unknown
28
Primary metric
Game with 28 yards of offense and 70.1 efficiency.
28 total offense with 70.1 efficiency.
#3
Wisconsin
14
Primary metric
Loss with 14 yards of offense and 41.3 efficiency.
14 total offense with 41.3 efficiency.
#4
South Alabama
-6
Primary metric
Win with -6 yards of offense and 52.1 efficiency.
-6 total offense with 52.1 efficiency.
#5
Northern Illinois
10
Primary metric
Loss with 10 yards of offense and 12.5 efficiency.
10 total offense with 12.5 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2014 Postseason · Bowling Green
127 primary output · 45.2 efficiency · 6.7 usage
44.4
#2
2014 Regular Season · Bowling Green
44.4
127 primary · 45.2 efficiency · 6.7 usage
Milestones
0
250+ passing yards
0
300+ total offense
0
3+ takeover TD games
1
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
127
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 5 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.